OBJECTIVE Across a correlational cross-sectional and experimental study, we investigate how contextual variables, such as majority group perceptions, interact with individual variables, such as the relationship between ethnic and national identity, to ultimately influence intergroup relations between bicultural individuals and White Americans. METHOD Across 2 studies (Study 1, n = 187; Study 2, n = 176), bicultural participants completed a battery of surveys measuring bicultural identity integration, impressions of majority group attitudes, and behavioral intentions targeted at majority group members. Additionally, majority group attitudes were experimentally manipulated in Study 2. RESULTS Individuals with integrated bicultural identities were more likely to approach and less likely to avoid majority members. Although perceptions of negative majority group attitudes are typically associated with negative intergroup relations, individuals with greater harmony (Study 1) and blendedness (Study 2) between their ethnic and national identities were buffered from these adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the importance of both individual and contextual factors in intergroup relations. The distinct effects of blendedness and harmony across self-report and experimental studies have theoretical and practical implications for our understanding of bicultural identity integration. Finally, implications for encouraging more positive intercultural relationships between majority and minority group members will be discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

检查多数群体态度和双文化身份整合在双文化学生对美国白人的行为反应中的作用。

目的在一项相关的横断面和实验研究中，我们调查了上下文变量（例如多数群体的看法）如何与个体变量（例如种族和民族身份之间的关系）相互作用，以最终影响双文化个体与美国白人之间的群体间关系。方法在2项研究中（研究1，n = 187；研究2，n = 176），双文化参与者完成了一系列调查，测量了双文化身份整合，多数群体态度的印象以及针对多数群体成员的行为意图。另外，在研究2中通过实验操作了多数群体的态度。结果具有双重文化身份的个体更容易接近多数成员，而避免回避多数成员的可能性更高。尽管对否定多数群体态度的看法通常与消极的群体间关系有关，但在族裔和民族身份之间具有更大的和谐感（研究1）和融合（研究2）的个人受到了这些不利影响的缓冲。结论这些发现强调了个体和背景因素在群体间关系中的重要性。跨自我报告和实验研究的融合与和谐的独特影响，对我们对双文化身份整合的理解具有理论和实践意义。最后，将讨论鼓励多数与少数群体成员之间建立更积极的跨文化关系的含义。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。