Perhaps nowhere in European prehistory does the idea of clearly-defined cultural boundaries remain more current than in the initial Neolithic, where the southeast–northwest trend of the spread of farming crosses what is perceived as a sharp divide between the Balkans and central Europe. This corresponds to a distinction between the Vinča culture package, named for a classic site in Serbia, with its characteristic pottery assemblage and absence of longhouses, and the Linearbandkeramik (LBK), with equally diagnostic but different pottery, and its apparently culturally-diagnostic longhouses, extending in a more northerly belt through central Europe westward to the Dutch coast. In this paper we question the concept of such a clear division through a presentation of new data from the site of Szederkény-Kukorica-dűlő. A large settlement in southeast Transdanubia, Hungary, excavated in advance of road construction, Szederkény is notable for its combination of pottery styles, variously including Vinča A, Ražište and LBK, and longhouses of a kind otherwise familiar from the LBK world. Formal modelling of its date establishes that the site probably began in the later 54th century cal BC, lasting until the first decades of the 52nd century cal BC. Occupation, featuring longhouses, pits and graves, probably began at the same time in the eastern and western parts of the settlement, starting a decade or two later in the central part; the western part was probably the last to be abandoned. Vinča pottery is predominantly associated with the eastern and central parts of the site, and Ražište pottery with the west. Formal modelling of the early history of longhouses in the LBK world suggests their emergence in the Formative LBK of Transdanubia c. 5500 cal BC followed by rapid dispersal in the middle of the 54th century cal BC, associated with the ‘earliest’ (älteste) LBK. The adoption of longhouses at Szederkény thus appears to come a few generations after the start of this ‘diaspora’. Rather than explaining the mixture of things, practices and perhaps people at Szederkény with reference to problematic notions such as hybridity, we propose instead a more fluid and varied vocabulary, encompassing combination and amalgamation, relationships and performance in the flow of social life, and networks; this makes greater allowance for diversity and interleaving in a context of rapid change.

中文翻译：

---

在Vinča和Linearbandkeramik世界之间：匈牙利西南及其他地区，公元前54-53世纪的实践和身份的多样性。

在欧洲史前史中，清晰界定文化界限的想法可能没有哪个比现在的新石器时代更流行了。在新石器时代，东南到西北的农业扩张趋势跨越了巴尔干与中欧之间的急剧鸿沟。这对应于以塞尔维亚的一个经典遗址命名的Vinča文化包，它具有独特的陶器组合，没有长屋，与Linearbandkeramik有区别（LBK），陶器具有相同的诊断能力，但陶器也有所不同，其长屋在文化上也具有诊断意义，它在较北端的地带穿过中欧向西延伸至荷兰海岸。在本文中，我们通过展示Szederkény-Kukorica-dűlő站点的新数据来质疑这种清晰划分的概念。Szederkény是匈牙利Transdanubia东南部的一个大型定居点，是在修路之前开挖的，以其陶器风格的结合而著称，其中包括VinčaA，Ražište和LBK等各种风格的陶器，以及LBK世界中其他类似的长屋。对该日期的正式建模表明该地点可能始于公元前54世纪后期，一直持续到公元前52世纪前几十年。以长屋，坑和坟墓为特色的职业，可能是在定居点的东部和西部同时开始的，从中部开始的一两年后开始；西部可能是最后被遗弃的地方。Vinča陶器主要与遗址的东部和中部地区相关，而Ražište陶器则与西部地区相关。LBK世界长屋早期历史的正式模型表明，它们出现在Transdanubia c的形成性LBK中。公元前5500年，随后在公元前54世纪中叶迅速扩散，这与“最早的” LBK世界长屋早期历史的正式模型表明，它们出现在Transdanubia c的形成性LBK中。公元前5500年，随后在公元前54世纪中叶迅速扩散，这与“最早的” LBK世界长屋早期历史的正式模型表明，它们出现在Transdanubia c的形成性LBK中。公元前5500年，随后在公元前54世纪中叶迅速扩散，这与“最早的”älteste）LBK。因此，在“散居”活动开始后的几代人中，在塞德肯尼（Szederkény）采用长屋似乎已经过去了几代人。与其参考诸如混合性之类的问题概念，不解释事物，实践甚至是塞泽德尼人的混合，我们而是提出了一种更加灵活多变的词汇，涵盖了组合与融合，社交生活和网络中的关系和表现。 ; 在快速变化的情况下，这为多样性和交织提供了更大的余地。