当前位置: X-MOL 学术Laterality › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Does a continuous measure of handedness predict reading processes and reading-related skills across the lifespan?
Laterality ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2008-07-09 , DOI: 10.1080/13576500802164133
Michele H Brenneman 1 , Scott Decker , Joel Meyers , Katrina Johnson
Affiliation  

The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between handedness, reading skills, and reading-related cognitive processes. Although lateralised differences in brain functioning are well known, research regarding handedness, specific reading skills, and reading-related cognitive processes is ambiguous at best because handedness is often measured as a dichotomous variable rather than a continuous variable. This methodological difference contributes to the diverse research findings, therefore the present investigation addressed these methodological limitations. A large normative sample of up to 1383 participants who ranged in age from 4 to 80 completed the Woodcock Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised (Woodcock & Johnson, 1989a, 1989b) or the Woodcock Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Third Edition (Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001) in combination with the Dean Woodcock Sensory Motor Battery (Dean & Woodcock, 2003) lateral preference scale, a continuous measure of handedness. Polynomial multiple regression analyses indicated curvilinear relationships between handedness and reading skills, along with handedness and auditory working memory. Individuals towards the extremes of the handedness continuum performed less well on the reading-related tasks. Therefore, just knowing a general classification of right, left, or mixed handed will not provide significant knowledge regarding lateralisation or potential cognitive and academic consequences but rather knowledge of an individual's hand preference on a continuum may well be useful for evaluative purposes.

中文翻译:

是否连续进行测验习惯可以预测整个寿命期间的阅读过程和与阅读相关的技能?

这项研究的目的是调查惯性,阅读技巧和与阅读相关的认知过程之间的关系。尽管大脑功能的侧向差异是众所周知的,但是关于惯用性,特定阅读技能以及与阅读相关的认知过程的研究充其量是模棱两可的,因为惯用性通常被衡量为二分变量而不是连续变量。这种方法上的差异有助于各种研究结果,因此,本研究解决了这些方法上的局限性。伍德考克约翰逊心理教育电池修订版(伍德考克和约翰逊,1989a,1989b)或伍德考克约翰逊心理教育电池第三版(伍德考克,麦格鲁,(&Mather,2001)与Dean Woodcock感官动力电池(Dean&Woodcock,2003)的横向偏爱量表的结合,这是一种连续性测度。多项式多元回归分析表明惯性和阅读技巧之间的曲线关系,以及惯性和听觉工作记忆。趋于惯用性连续体的个人在阅读相关任务上的表现较差。因此,仅了解右手,左手或混合手的一般分类将不会提供有关偏侧化或潜在的认知和学术后果的大量知识,而是了解个人在连续统上的手偏爱可能对于评估目的很有用。2003)横向偏爱量表,连续性测度。多项式多元回归分析表明惯性和阅读技巧之间的曲线关系,以及惯性和听觉工作记忆。趋于惯用性连续体的个人在阅读相关任务上的表现较差。因此,仅了解右手,左手或混合手的一般分类将不会提供有关偏侧化或潜在的认知和学术后果的大量知识,而是了解个人在连续统上的手偏爱可能对于评估目的很有用。2003)横向偏爱量表,连续性测度。多项式多元回归分析表明惯性和阅读技巧之间的曲线关系,以及惯性和听觉工作记忆。趋于惯用性连续体的个人在阅读相关任务上的表现较差。因此,仅了解右手,左手或混合手的一般分类将不会提供有关偏侧化或潜在的认知和学术后果的大量知识,而是了解个人在连续统上的手偏爱可能对于评估目的很有用。以及惯用和听觉工作记忆。趋于惯用性连续体的个人在阅读相关任务上的表现较差。因此,仅了解右手,左手或混合手的一般分类将不会提供有关偏侧化或潜在的认知和学术后果的大量知识,而是了解个人在连续统上的手偏爱可能对于评估目的很有用。以及惯用和听觉工作记忆。趋于惯用性连续体的个人在阅读相关任务上的表现较差。因此,仅了解右手,左手或混合手的一般分类将不会提供有关偏侧化或潜在的认知和学术后果的大量知识,而是了解个人在连续统上的手偏爱可能对于评估目的很有用。
更新日期:2019-11-01
down
wechat
bug