Evaluation is a major issue in discussions of transdisciplinary research (TDR). Empirical studies often consider expert perspectives; however, knowledge of the experiences, attitudes, and motivations of a broader science-practice community applying transdisciplinarity remains rare. The present study aims to gather insights into the perceptions and assessments of success of TDR projects from scientists and practitioners with experience with TDR processes. Based on a mixed-method approach combining qualitative expert interviews with a quantitative survey reaching 178 respondents from practice and science, the results show a high commitment to the targets of TDR projects and a basic shared ‘success profile’. Nevertheless, there is currently a strong ‘practice tendency’, while TDR-specific benefits of the scientific knowledge gain remain neglected. The general success assessment of TDR projects can be described as rather moderate, indicating several deficits in the application and management of TDR.

中文翻译：

---

可持续土地利用跨学科研究的成功：个人的看法和评估。

评价是跨学科研究（TDR）讨论中的主要问题。实证研究经常考虑专家的观点。但是，对于跨学科的广泛科学实践社区的经验，态度和动机的了解仍然很少。本研究旨在从具有TDR流程经验的科学家和从业者中收集对TDR项目成功的看法和评估的见解。基于将定性专家访谈与对178名来自实践和科学领域的受访者进行定量调查相结合的混合方法，结果显示了对TDR项目目标的高度承诺以及基本的共享“成功概况”。尽管如此，目前仍存在很强的“实践趋势”，而科学知识获取的TDR特定收益却被忽略。