This paper describes to what extent a more or less collective feeling of urgency to reform the Dutch housing market is addressed in the political arena. By doing that, it sheds some light on the effectiveness and influence of academic research and recommendations on the political decision making process. We conclude that the suggestion of several advisory bodies to start a serious reform of the housing system in the Netherlands is, due to coalition considerations, almost fully neglected by the Dutch Government. Although there is a common understanding among experts and interest organisations in the Netherlands that the current housing systems needs radical changes, coalition politics in the Netherlands are apparently more important to explain current housing policies. We conclude that the effectiveness and influence of academic research and recommendations on the political decision making process was quite modest in the last couple of years and try to explain the gap between academic research and political decision-making on Dutch housing policy.

中文翻译：

---

住房制度改革：咨询委员会的观点与荷兰的政治现实。

本文描述了在政治舞台上解决荷兰住房市场改革的集体迫切程度的程度。通过这样做，它为学术研究的有效性和影响以及对政治决策过程的建议提供了一些启示。我们得出的结论是，由于联盟的考虑，荷兰政府几乎完全忽略了几个咨询机构提出的对荷兰住房制度进行认真改革的建议。尽管荷兰的专家和利益组织对当前的住房体系需要进行根本的改变达成了共识，但荷兰的联合政治显然对解释当前的住房政策更为重要。