The authors regret that they mischaracterized the composition of two cell populations in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in the discussion within Box 1 of the original article. We would like to correct the following sentence on page 465, Box 1. Outstanding Questions. First bullet point under the heading “Reward prediction error signals in different regions”:“Dopamine neurons in the VTA have also been suggested to represent TD error [3,6,7,9]. We speculate that the two populations of VTA GABAergic cells…” should read: “Dopamine neurons in the VTA have also been suggested to represent TD error [3,6,7,9]. We speculate that the two populations of VTA cells (GABAergic and unidentified)…”The authors apologize for any inconvenience this has caused.

中文翻译：

---

强化学习：通过不同的皮质纹状体通路计算值的时间差异

作者感到遗憾的是，他们在原始文章框 1 的讨论中错误地描述了腹侧被盖区 (VTA) 中两个细胞群的组成。我们想更正第 465 页方框 1 中的以下句子。悬而未决的问题。“不同区域的奖励预测误差信号”标题下的第一个要点：“VTA 中的多巴胺神经元也被建议代表 TD 误差 [3,6,7,9]。我们推测 VTA GABA 能细胞的两个群体……”应为：“VTA 中的多巴胺神经元也被建议代表 TD 错误 [3,6,7,9]。我们推测这两种 VTA 细胞群（GABAergic 和未鉴定的）……”作者对由此造成的任何不便表示歉意。