Priming has emerged as a valuable tool within the psychological study of religion, allowing for tests of religion's causal effect on a number of psychological outcomes, such as prosocial behavior. As the literature has grown, questions about the reliability and boundary conditions of religious priming have arisen. We use a combination of traditional effect-size analyses, p-curve analyses, and adjustments for publication bias to evaluate the robustness of four types of religious priming (Analyses 1-3), review the empirical evidence for religion's effect specifically on prosocial behavior (Analyses 4-5), and test whether religious-priming effects generalize to individuals who report little or no religiosity (Analyses 6-7). Results across 93 studies and 11,653 participants show that religious priming has robust effects across a variety of outcome measures-prosocial measures included. Religious priming does not, however, reliably affect non-religious participants-suggesting that priming depends on the cognitive activation of culturally transmitted religious beliefs.

中文翻译：

---

宗教启蒙：以亲友关系为重点的荟萃分析。

引发已成为宗教心理学研究中的一种宝贵工具，可以测试宗教对诸如亲社会行为之类的许多心理结果的因果作用。随着文献的增长，人们对宗教信仰的可靠性和边界条件提出了质疑。我们结合使用传统的效应大小分析，p曲线分析和针对出版偏差的调整来评估四种类型的宗教信仰的鲁棒性（分析1-3），回顾宗教对亲社会行为的影响的经验证据（分析1-3）。分析4-5），并测试宗教引发效应是否普遍适用于报告宗教很少或没有宗教信仰的个人（分析6-7）。93项研究和11项研究的结果 653名参与者表明，宗教启蒙在各种结果指标（包括亲社会指标）中具有强大的作用。但是，宗教启动不能可靠地影响非宗教参与者，这表明启动取决于文化传播的宗教信仰的认知激活。