当前位置: X-MOL 学术Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Different ontologies: land change science and health research.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ( IF 7.2 ) Pub Date : 2013-10-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.006
Joseph P Messina 1 , William K Pan 2
Affiliation  

Land use and land cover (LULC) is now recognized as an important driver of disease. For emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases, LULC offers context and serves as a likely proximate driver of risk particularly when considering vector-borne or zoonotic diseases. Ontological differences embedded within disciplinary structures impede progress limiting the ultimate potential of both LULC data and land change theory within disease research. Geography, space, and time serve as effective complements to traditional health and place organizational and disease-research strategies. Improved systemic clarity is obtained if one orients the disease relationship to particular contexts and if the scales of the relationships are clearly defined.

中文翻译:

不同的本体论:土地变化科学和健康研究。

土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC)现在被认为是疾病的重要驱动因素。对于新出现或重新出现的传染病,LULC提供了背景,并可能是潜在的危险驱动因素,尤其是在考虑病媒传播或人畜共患疾病时。学科结构中嵌入的本体论差异阻碍了进展,从而限制了LULC数据和土地变化理论在疾病研究中的最终潜力。地理,空间和时间是对传统健康的有效补充,并制定了组织和疾病研究策略。如果人们将疾病关系定位于特定的环境,并且关系的规模得到明确定义,则可获得更高的系统清晰度。
更新日期:2013-06-03
down
wechat
bug