当前位置: X-MOL 学术Lancet › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Notions from Kavanaugh hearings contradict medical facts
The Lancet ( IF 98.4 ) Pub Date : 2018-10-05 , DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32481-4
Homer Venters

Survivors of sexual abuse around the world are reeling from the horrifying and compelling details emerging from the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearings of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. What has shocked me most, as a health professional, is the harmful and untrue narrative that has surfaced during the hearings: the idea that the incomplete memory of an assault, or a delay in reporting abuse, reflects on the truth of the abuse itself. Physicians for Human Rights has trained thousands of health-care professionals across the globe to evaluate survivors of abuse, from the USA to Kenya and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, to the former Yugoslavia, and to Iraq. Through our work, we know that this rationale is fundamentally flawed and blatantly untrue.

中文翻译:

卡瓦诺听证会的观点与医学事实相矛盾

参议院司法委员会布雷特·卡瓦诺(Brett Kavanaugh)法官的审理听证会上出现的令人震惊和令人信服的细节使全世界性虐待的幸存者感到振奋。作为一名医疗专业人员,最令我震惊的是在听证会上浮现出的有害和不真实的叙述:关于袭击的不完整记忆或延迟报告虐待的想法反映了虐待本身的真实性。人权医师培训了全球成千上万的医疗保健专业人员,以评估虐待幸存者,从美国到肯尼亚,刚果民主共和国,从前南斯拉夫到伊拉克。通过我们的工作,我们知道这个基本原理从根本上是有缺陷的,而公然是不真实的。
更新日期:2018-10-19
down
wechat
bug