当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Precision of different fatigue methods for predicting glass-ceramic failure
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2018-09-05 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.004
Rodrigo Ottoni , Jason A. Griggs , Pedro H. Corazza , Álvaro Della Bona , Márcia Borba

This study aimed to characterize the fatigue behavior using two fatigue methods, boundary and staircase, and to predict the probability of failure (Pf) of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic (ZLS). Bar-shaped specimens of ZLS (18 ×4 ×1.2 mm) were fabricated. Thirty specimens were subjected to a three-point flexural strength test using a universal testing machine with 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed, in 37 °C distilled water. Flexural strength data were analyzed with Weibull statistics. Eighty-six bars were subjected to cyclic fatigue using boundary and staircase methods. Fatigue tests were performed in a pneumatic cycling machine (2 Hz, 37 °C distilled water) for 10 ³ and 104 cycles. Fatigue data were analyzed using an inverse power law relationship and log normal-lifetime distribution. Fracture toughness (KIc) was determined using V-notched specimens (18 ×4 ×3 mm) and the short beam toughness method (n = 7). Vickers hardness (VH) was evaluated (4.9 N, 20 s). Fractographic and EDS analyses were also performed. ZLS showed a characteristic strength of 197 MPa, Weibull modulus of 4, VH of 6.67 GPa and KIc of 1.93 MPa m1/2. After 103 cycles, for both methods, there was a degradation of 78% of the initial strength. There was no significant degradation when the number of cycles increased from 103 to 104. Both methods resulted in similar Pf and precision at 40 MPa (~50% Pf). Yet, staircase shows good accuracy and precision in predicting the stress amplitude for a Pf near 50%; while boundary is also effective for Pf lower than 50%. The fatigue methods evaluated show similar accuracy and precision for predicting the Pf of a glass-ceramic when simulations were made in the range of stress levels and lifetimes used in the fatigue tests.



中文翻译:

不同疲劳方法预测玻璃陶瓷失效的精度

这项研究旨在使用边界和阶梯两种疲劳方法表征疲劳行为,并预测氧化锆增强硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(ZLS)的失效概率(P f)。制作了ZLS的棒状标本(18×4×1.2 mm)。使用万能试验机,以0.5 mm / min的十字头速度,在37°C的蒸馏水中对30个样品进行三点弯曲强度测试。弯曲强度数据用威布尔统计分析。使用边界和阶梯方法对86根钢筋进行了循环疲劳。在气动循环机(2 Hz,37°C蒸馏水)中进行了10³和10 4的疲劳测试周期。使用逆幂定律关系分析疲劳数据,并记录正态寿命分布。使用V型缺口试样(18×4×3 mm)和短梁韧性方法(n = 7)确定断裂韧性(K Ic)。评价了维氏硬度(VH)(4.9 N,20 s)。分形和EDS分析也进行了。ZLS的特征强度为197 MPa,威布尔模量为4,VH为6.67 GPa,KIc为1.93 MPa m 1/2。在10 3个循环之后,两种方法的初始强度均降低了78%。当循环数从10 3增加到10 4时,没有明显的降解。两种方法均得出相似的P f精度为40 MPa(〜50%P f)。然而,楼梯在预测P f接近50%的应力幅度时显示出了良好的精度和精确度。边界对于P f小于50%也是有效的。当在疲劳测试中使用的应力水平和寿命范围内进行模拟时,所评估的疲劳方法在预测玻璃陶瓷的P f时显示出相似的精度和精确度。

更新日期:2018-09-05
down
wechat
bug