当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Intralesional immunotherapy for the treatment of warts: A network meta-analysis.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology ( IF 12.8 ) Pub Date : 2018-07-10 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.003
Samar Salman 1 , Mohamed Shehata Ahmed 2 , Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim 3 , Omar Mohamed Mattar 4 , Hassan El-Shirbiny 5 , Sameh Sarsik 6 , Ahmed M Afifi 7 , Ruba Marwan Anis 4 , Nadim Aiman Yakoub Agha 4 , Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk 7
Affiliation  

BACKGROUND Without clear evidence, selecting among the existing immunotherapeutic options for warts remains challenging. OBJECTIVE Through network meta-analyses, we aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different intralesional immunotherapeutic modalities. METHODS We included randomized controlled trials comparing intralesional immunotherapeutic modalities to cryotherapy, placebo, or imiquimod. All outcomes were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Both conventional and network meta-analyses (with a frequentist approach) were conducted on R software. The P-score was used to rank different treatments. RESULTS Network meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials (1676 patients) showed that PPD (purified protein derivative vaccine, OR 39.56), MMR (measles, mumps, rubella vaccine, OR 17.46) and interferon β (OR 15.55) had the highest efficacy in terms of complete recovery at the primary site compared with placebo. Regarding complete recovery at the distant site, autoinoculation (OR 79.95), PPD (OR 42.95), and MMR (OR 15.39) were all statistically superior to placebo. According to the P-score, MMR was more effective than other modalities in reducing the recurrence rate at the same site. LIMITATIONS Relatively small sample size in some comparisons and variability in baseline characteristics. CONCLUSION PPD and MMR were the most effective in achieving complete primary and distant recovery (along with autoinoculation for distant recovery) and reducing the recurrence rate at the same site compared with cryotherapy and other immunotherapeutic modalities.

中文翻译:

鼻内免疫疗法治疗疣:网络荟萃分析。

背景技术在没有明确证据的情况下,在现有的疣治疗方法中进行选择仍然具有挑战性。目的通过网络荟萃分析,我们旨在评估不同病灶内免疫治疗方式的比较疗效。方法我们纳入了将病灶内免疫治疗方式与冷冻疗法,安慰剂或咪喹莫特进行比较的随机对照试验。所有结果均以具有95%置信区间的优势比(OR)表示。常规和网络荟萃分析(采用频度分析方法)均在R软件上进行。P得分用于对不同的治疗方法进行排名。结果对17项随机对照试验(1676例患者)进行的网络荟萃分析显示,PPD(纯化的蛋白衍生物疫苗,OR 39.56),MMR(麻疹,腮腺炎,风疹疫苗,OR 17)。与安慰剂相比,就主要部位的完全恢复而言,第46页)和干扰素β(OR 15.55)的疗效最高。关于远处部位的完全恢复,在统计学上,自动接种(OR 79.95),PPD(OR 42.95)和MMR(OR 15.39)均优于安慰剂。根据P评分,MMR在降低同一部位的复发率方面比其他方式更有效。局限性一些比较中的样本量相对较小,基线特征也存在差异。结论与冷冻疗法和其他免疫疗法相比,PPD和MMR在实现完全的原发和远处恢复(以及自动接种以实现远处恢复)和降低同一部位的复发率方面最有效。55)与安慰剂相比,在原发部位完全恢复方面具有最高的疗效。关于远处部位的完全恢复,在统计学上,自动接种(OR 79.95),PPD(OR 42.95)和MMR(OR 15.39)均优于安慰剂。根据P评分,MMR在降低同一部位的复发率方面比其他方式更有效。局限性一些比较中的样本量相对较小,基线特征也存在差异。结论与冷冻疗法和其他免疫疗法相比,PPD和MMR最有效地实现了完整的原发和远处恢复(以及自动接种以实现远处恢复)并降低了同一部位的复发率。55)与安慰剂相比,在原发部位完全恢复方面具有最高的疗效。关于远处部位的完全恢复,在统计学上,自动接种(OR 79.95),PPD(OR 42.95)和MMR(OR 15.39)均优于安慰剂。根据P评分,MMR在降低同一部位的复发率方面比其他方式更有效。局限性一些比较中的样本量相对较小,基线特征也存在差异。结论与冷冻疗法和其他免疫疗法相比,PPD和MMR最有效地实现了完整的原发和远处恢复(以及自动接种以实现远处恢复)并降低了同一部位的复发率。95)和MMR(OR 15.39)在统计学上均优于安慰剂。根据P评分,MMR在降低同一部位的复发率方面比其他方式更有效。局限性一些比较中的样本量相对较小,基线特征也存在差异。结论与冷冻疗法和其他免疫疗法相比,PPD和MMR最有效地实现了完整的原发和远处恢复(以及自动接种以实现远处恢复)并降低了同一部位的复发率。95)和MMR(OR 15.39)在统计学上均优于安慰剂。根据P评分,MMR在降低同一部位的复发率方面比其他方式更有效。局限性一些比较中的样本量相对较小,基线特征也存在差异。结论与冷冻疗法和其他免疫疗法相比,PPD和MMR最有效地实现了完整的原发和远处恢复(以及自动接种以实现远处恢复)并降低了同一部位的复发率。
更新日期:2018-07-10
down
wechat
bug