An expert panel has offered some new solutions to an old problem in U.S. biomedical research: too many young scientists vying for scarce academic research jobs and stable funding. Although many of its recommendations echo past proposals that have largely failed to gain traction, a few—including one to limit postdoctoral researchers to receiving just 3 years of funding from their principal investigators (PIs), and another to create a new federal oversight council—are catalyzing heated debate. The problem with current funding practices, the panel says, is that they encourage some PIs to view postdocs primarily as labor and provide little career mentoring. As a result, postdocs can linger in relatively poorly paid positions for years. But the proposed 3-year postdoc cap has drawn fierce opposition, which some researchers worry could prematurely end careers.

中文翻译：

---

从困境中拯救博士后的提议引来了飞镖

一个专家小组为美国生物医学研究中的一个老问题提供了一些新的解决方案：太多的年轻科学家争夺稀缺的学术研究工作和稳定的资金。尽管它的许多建议呼应了过去基本上没有获得支持的建议，但有一些建议——包括限制博士后研究人员只能从他们的主要研究人员 (PI) 那里获得 3 年的资助，以及另一个建立新的联邦监督委员会——正在引发激烈的争论。该小组表示，当前资助实践的问题在于，它们鼓励一些 PI 将博士后主要视为劳动力，而几乎不提供职业指导。结果，博士后可以在薪酬相对较低的职位上逗留多年。但提议的 3 年博士后上限遭到了强烈反对，