当前位置: X-MOL 学术ACS Omega › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reconciling Selectivity Trends from a Comprehensive Kinase Inhibitor Profiling Campaign with Known Activity Data
ACS Omega ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2018-03-14 00:00:00 , DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b00243
Filip Miljković 1 , Jürgen Bajorath 1
Affiliation  

Kinase inhibitors are among the most intensely investigated compounds in medicinal chemistry and drug development. Profiling experiments and kinome screens reveal binding characteristics of kinase inhibitors and lead to better understanding of selectivity and promiscuity patterns. However, only limited amounts of profiling data are publicly available. By contrast, a large body of activity data for inhibitors of human kinases has become available from medicinal chemistry. In this study, we have correlated selectivity assessment of clinical kinase inhibitors from the most comprehensive profiling campaign reported to date with systematic mining of activity data from other sources. The results of our comparative analysis reveal consistency of orthogonal approaches in the study of kinase inhibitor selectivity versus promiscuity and stress the importance of taking alternative data confidence criteria into account. Moreover, it is also shown that there are little if any detectable differences in selectivity between type I and II kinase inhibitors and that inhibitors designated as chemical probes have very different target profiles.

中文翻译:

通过已知的活动数据,通过全面的激酶抑制剂分析活动来协调选择性趋势

激酶抑制剂是药物化学和药物开发中研究最深入的化合物之一。分析实验和激酶组筛选揭示了激酶抑制剂的结合特征,并导致对选择性和混杂模式的更好理解。但是,只有有限数量的分析数据可公开获得。相比之下,人类激酶抑制剂的大量活性数据已从药物化学中获得。在这项研究中,我们将迄今为止报道的最全面的概况分析活动与临床激酶抑制剂的选择性评估与其他来源的活性数据的系统挖掘相关联。我们的比较分析结果显示,在激酶抑制剂选择性与滥交性研究中,正交方法的一致性,并强调了考虑替代数据置信度标准的重要性。而且,还显示出I型和II型激酶抑制剂之间在选择性上几乎没有可检测的差异,并且指定为化学探针的抑制剂具有非常不同的靶标。
更新日期:2018-03-14
down
wechat
bug