当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Pathologist characteristics associated with accuracy and reproducibility of melanocytic skin lesion interpretation
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology ( IF 12.8 ) Pub Date : 2018-03-07 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.070
David E Elder 1 , Michael W Piepkorn 2 , Raymond L Barnhill 3 , Gary M Longton 4 , Heidi D Nelson 5 , Stevan R Knezevich 6 , Margaret S Pepe 4 , Patricia A Carney 7 , Linda J Titus 8 , Tracy Onega 9 , Anna N A Tosteson 10 , Martin A Weinstock 11 , Joann G Elmore 12
Affiliation  

Background

Diagnostic interpretations of melanocytic skin lesions vary widely among pathologists, yet the underlying reasons remain unclear.

Objective

Identify pathologist characteristics associated with rates of accuracy and reproducibility.

Methods

Pathologists independently interpreted the same set of biopsy specimens from melanocytic lesions on 2 occasions. Diagnoses were categorized into 1 of 5 classes according to the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis system. Reproducibility was determined by pathologists’ concordance of diagnoses across 2 occasions. Accuracy was defined by concordance with a consensus reference standard. Associations of pathologist characteristics with reproducibility and accuracy were assessed individually and in multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

Rates of diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy were highest among pathologists with board certification and/or fellowship training in dermatopathology and in those with 5 or more years of experience. In addition, accuracy was high among pathologists with a higher proportion of melanocytic lesions in their caseload composition and higher volume of melanocytic lesions.

Limitations

Data gathered in a test set situation by using a classification tool not currently in clinical use.

Conclusion

Diagnoses are more accurate among pathologists with specialty training and those with more experience interpreting melanocytic lesions. These findings support the practice of referring difficult cases to more experienced pathologists to improve diagnostic accuracy, although the impact of these referrals on patient outcomes requires additional research.



中文翻译:


与黑素细胞皮肤病变解释的准确性和可重复性相关的病理学家特征


 背景


病理学家对黑素细胞皮肤病变的诊断解释差异很大,但根本原因仍不清楚。

 客观的


确定与准确率和再现性相关的病理学家特征。

 方法


病理学家对同一组黑素细胞病变活检标本进行了两次独立解读。根据黑素细胞病理学评估工具和诊断层次系统将诊断分为 5 类中的 1 类。再现性由病理学家两次诊断的一致性决定。准确性是通过与共识参考标准的一致性来定义的。病理学家特征与可重复性和准确性的关联在多变量逻辑回归模型中进行了单独评估。

 结果


在获得皮肤病理学委员会认证和/或进修培训的病理学家以及具有 5 年或以上经验的病理学家中,诊断重复性和准确性最高。此外,在病例组成中黑素细胞病变比例较高且黑素细胞病变体积较大的病理学家中,准确性较高。

 局限性


使用目前临床上未使用的分类工具在测试集情况下收集的数据。

 结论


经过专业培训和具有更多解释黑素细胞病变经验的病理学家的诊断更加准确。这些发现支持将疑难病例转诊给更有经验的病理学家以提高诊断准确性的做法,尽管这些转诊对患者结果的影响需要进一步的研究。

更新日期:2018-03-07
down
wechat
bug