Abstract Aligning the sustainability in construction process can be achieved through material selection process with low impact on environment and human health. Today, biocomposite materials are investigated and developed to replace with none, and less eco-friendly materials used in the construction industry leading to emergence of next generation of sustainable and green building materials. This paper aims to develop a model of fully hybrid bio-based biocomposite based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and comparing it with fully petroleum-based composite, which are common conventional building materials. The methodology framework of this research is determined based on ISO 14040 and 14044. Also, the ReCiPe as the common method in SimaPro software is chosen for appraising and comparing LC impact assessment (LCIA). This research highlights the negative effect of these kinds of building materials with providing single scores coming from three gauges including Human Health, Ecosystems and resources. It is observed that substituting the biocomposite with the fully petroleum-based composite has led to a decline of about 30% in single score outcome. The significance of this research is related to important judgement information to policy makers and the prospective manufacturers in the commercialization phase of this new biocomposites as sustainable and green building materials.

中文翻译：

---

基于从摇篮到门的生命周期影响评估比较 KBF w EFB 混合增强聚羟基丁酸酯生物复合材料和常见的石油基复合材料作为建筑材料

摘要 通过对环境和人类健康影响低的材料选择过程，可以实现建设过程中的可持续性。今天，人们研究和开发了生物复合材料，以取代建筑行业中使用的无环保材料，从而导致下一代可持续和绿色建筑材料的出现。本文旨在开发一种基于生命周期评估 (LCA) 的全混合生物基生物复合材料模型，并将其与常见的常规建筑材料全石油基复合材料进行比较。本研究的方法学框架是基于ISO 14040和14044确定的。此外，选择ReCiPe作为SimaPro软件中的常用方法来评价和比较LC影响评估（LCIA）。这项研究通过提供来自三个指标（包括人类健康、生态系统和资源）的单一分数，突出了这些建筑材料的负面影响。据观察，用完全石油基复合材料代替生物复合材料导致单项评分结果下降约 30%。这项研究的意义与决策者和潜在制造商在这种新型生物复合材料作为可持续和绿色建筑材料的商业化阶段的重要判断信息有关。据观察，用完全石油基复合材料代替生物复合材料导致单项评分结果下降约 30%。这项研究的意义与决策者和潜在制造商在这种新型生物复合材料作为可持续和绿色建筑材料的商业化阶段的重要判断信息有关。据观察，用完全石油基复合材料代替生物复合材料导致单项评分结果下降约 30%。这项研究的意义与决策者和潜在制造商在这种新型生物复合材料作为可持续和绿色建筑材料的商业化阶段的重要判断信息有关。