Three serious challenges to Mahr & Csibra's (M&C's) proposal are presented. First, we argue that the epistemic attitude that they claim is unique to remembering also applies to some forms of imaginative simulations that aren't memories. Second, we argue that their account cannot accommodate critical neuropsychological evidence. Finally, we argue that their proposal looks unconvincing when compared to more parsimonious evolutionary accounts.

中文翻译：

---

为什么情景记忆可能不适合交流

提出了对 Mahr & Csibra (M&C's) 提案的三个严重挑战。首先，我们认为他们所声称的记忆特有的认知态度也适用于某些形式的非记忆的想象模拟。其次，我们认为他们的解释不能容纳关键的神经心理学证据。最后，我们认为，与更节俭的进化论相比，他们的提议看起来没有说服力。