当前位置：
X-MOL 学术
›
JAMA Pediatr.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Association of National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Career Development Awards With Subsequent Research Project Grant Funding
JAMA Pediatrics ( IF 24.7 ) Pub Date : 2018-03-01 , DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4305 Dennis A Twombly 1 , Sarah L Glavin 1 , Jennifer Guimond 1 , Susan Taymans 1 , Catherine Y Spong 1 , Diana W Bianchi 1
JAMA Pediatrics ( IF 24.7 ) Pub Date : 2018-03-01 , DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4305 Dennis A Twombly 1 , Sarah L Glavin 1 , Jennifer Guimond 1 , Susan Taymans 1 , Catherine Y Spong 1 , Diana W Bianchi 1
Affiliation
|
Importance Investing in the next generation of researchers is essential, as recently highlighted in the 21st Century Cures Act. From its inception, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) has supported training and career development to ensure a robust pipeline of investigators who are prepared to lead their respective fields of inquiry. In recent years, the NICHD has emphasized institutional over individual training awards to a greater degree than many other National Institutes of Health institutes of similar size. Objective To evaluate the success of individuals supported by NICHD career development and training awards, as measured by subsequent application and receipt of independent National Institutes of Health research project grant funding. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study identified 417 physician-scholars who were supported by NICHD career development awards between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2001. This period was selected to allow adequate follow-up of research project grant applications and funding. Among these physician-scholars, 355 met inclusion criteria. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were the numbers of research project grant applications submitted and, of these, the numbers that were successfully funded. Results Among 355 physician-scientists, scholars who had an MD degree only and received a K award or both an individual K award and institutional K12 support were more likely than those who received only K12 support (individual K only vs institutional K12 only: odds ratio [OR], 4.86; 95% CI, 1.83-13.62; both K and K12 vs K12 only: OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.46-7.10) to apply for subsequent project grant funding (88.0% vs 82.8% vs 60.1%, respectively; P < .001) and to receive it (60.0% vs 60.9% vs 32.9%, respectively; P < .001). For physicians with both MD and PhD degrees, neither application nor funding rates were statistically significantly different whether their career development was supported by individual or institutional awards. Conclusions and Relevance Physician-scholars are more likely to apply for and receive a National Institutes of Health research grant if they are trained on an individual career development award, with or without an institutional training award. Based on the data, the NICHD intends to provide a greater proportion of its career development fund allocation to individual awards. The NICHD recognizes the importance of institutional awards and will continue to support them. The NICHD remains committed to training and intends to maintain its investment in training and career development awards going forward.
中文翻译：
国家儿童健康和人类发展协会职业发展奖与后续研究项目资助
重要性 投资于下一代研究人员至关重要，正如最近在 21 世纪治愈法案中所强调的那样。从一开始，尤尼斯·肯尼迪·施莱佛国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所 (NICHD) 就一直支持培训和职业发展，以确保准备好领导各自调查领域的研究人员的强大管道。近年来，与许多其他类似规模的国立卫生研究院相比，NICHD 更加强调机构而非个人培训奖励。目的 评估 NICHD 职业发展和培训奖励支持的个人的成功，通过随后申请和收到独立的国立卫生研究院研究项目资助资金来衡量。设计，设置，和参与者 这项回顾性队列研究确定了 1999 年 10 月 1 日至 2001 年 9 月 30 日期间获得 NICHD 职业发展奖支持的 417 名医师学者。选择这一时期是为了对研究项目拨款申请和资金进行充分的跟进。在这些医师学者中，355 人符合纳入标准。主要成果和措施 主要成果是提交的研究项目资助申请的数量以及其中成功资助的数量。结果 在 355 名医师-科学家中，仅获得医学博士学位并获得 K 奖或同时获得个人 K 奖和机构 K12 支持的学者比仅获得 K12 支持的学者更有可能（仅个人 K 与仅机构 K12：优势比[OR]，4.86；95% CI，1.83-13.62；K 和 K12 与仅 K12：或，3.19；95% CI，1.46-7.10）申请后续项目资助（分别为88.0% vs 82.8% vs 60.1%；P < .001）并获得资助（分别为60.0% vs 60.9% vs 32.9%；P < .001)。对于同时拥有医学博士学位和博士学位的医生，无论他们的职业发展是得到个人奖励还是机构奖励，申请和资助率都没有统计学上的显着差异。结论和相关性 如果医师学者接受过个人职业发展奖的培训，无论是否获得机构培训奖，他们更有可能申请并获得美国国立卫生研究院的研究资助。根据这些数据，NICHD 打算将更大比例的职业发展基金分配给个人奖项。NICHD 认识到机构奖励的重要性，并将继续支持它们。NICHD 仍然致力于培训，并打算在未来保持对培训和职业发展奖项的投资。
更新日期：2018-03-01
中文翻译：
国家儿童健康和人类发展协会职业发展奖与后续研究项目资助
重要性 投资于下一代研究人员至关重要，正如最近在 21 世纪治愈法案中所强调的那样。从一开始，尤尼斯·肯尼迪·施莱佛国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所 (NICHD) 就一直支持培训和职业发展，以确保准备好领导各自调查领域的研究人员的强大管道。近年来，与许多其他类似规模的国立卫生研究院相比，NICHD 更加强调机构而非个人培训奖励。目的 评估 NICHD 职业发展和培训奖励支持的个人的成功，通过随后申请和收到独立的国立卫生研究院研究项目资助资金来衡量。设计，设置，和参与者 这项回顾性队列研究确定了 1999 年 10 月 1 日至 2001 年 9 月 30 日期间获得 NICHD 职业发展奖支持的 417 名医师学者。选择这一时期是为了对研究项目拨款申请和资金进行充分的跟进。在这些医师学者中，355 人符合纳入标准。主要成果和措施 主要成果是提交的研究项目资助申请的数量以及其中成功资助的数量。结果 在 355 名医师-科学家中，仅获得医学博士学位并获得 K 奖或同时获得个人 K 奖和机构 K12 支持的学者比仅获得 K12 支持的学者更有可能（仅个人 K 与仅机构 K12：优势比[OR]，4.86；95% CI，1.83-13.62；K 和 K12 与仅 K12：或，3.19；95% CI，1.46-7.10）申请后续项目资助（分别为88.0% vs 82.8% vs 60.1%；P < .001）并获得资助（分别为60.0% vs 60.9% vs 32.9%；P < .001)。对于同时拥有医学博士学位和博士学位的医生，无论他们的职业发展是得到个人奖励还是机构奖励，申请和资助率都没有统计学上的显着差异。结论和相关性 如果医师学者接受过个人职业发展奖的培训，无论是否获得机构培训奖，他们更有可能申请并获得美国国立卫生研究院的研究资助。根据这些数据，NICHD 打算将更大比例的职业发展基金分配给个人奖项。NICHD 认识到机构奖励的重要性，并将继续支持它们。NICHD 仍然致力于培训，并打算在未来保持对培训和职业发展奖项的投资。
京公网安备 11010802027423号