当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ann. Oncol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Adjuvant everolimus in high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final results from the PILLAR-2 randomized phase III trial.
Annals of Oncology ( IF 56.7 ) Pub Date : 2018-03-01 , DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx764
T E Witzig 1 , K Tobinai 2 , L Rigacci 3 , T Ikeda 4 , A Vanazzi 5 , M Hino 6 , Y Shi 7 , J Mayer 8 , L J Costa 9 , C D Bermudez Silva 10 , J Zhu 11 , D Belada 12 , K Bouabdallah 13 , J G Kattan 14 , J Kuruvilla 15 , W S Kim 16 , J-F Larouche 17 , M Ogura 18 , M Ozcan 19 , L Fayad 20 , C Wu 21 , J Fan 21 , A-L Louveau 22 , M Voi 21 , F Cavalli 23
Affiliation  

Background Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≥3 are at higher risk for relapse after a complete response (CR) to first-line rituximab-based chemotherapy (R-chemo). Everolimus has single-agent activity in lymphoma. PILLAR-2 aimed to improve disease-free survival (DFS) with 1 year of adjuvant everolimus. Patients and methods Patients with high-risk (IPI ≥3) DLBCL and a positron emission tomography/computed tomography-confirmed CR to first-line R-chemo were randomized to 1 year of everolimus 10 mg/day or placebo. The primary end point was DFS; secondary end points were overall survival, lymphoma-specific survival, and safety. Results Between August 2009 and December 2013, 742 patients were randomized to everolimus (n = 372) or placebo (n = 370). Median follow-up was 50.4 months (range 24.0-76.9). Overall, 47% of patients were ≥65 years, 50% were male, and 42% had an IPI of 4 or 5. 48% and 67% completed everolimus and placebo, respectively. Primary reasons for everolimus discontinuation versus placebo were adverse events (AEs; 30% versus 12%) and relapsed disease (6% versus 13%). Everolimus did not significantly improve DFS compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.92; 95% CI 0.69-1.22; P = 0.276). Two-year DFS rate was 77.8% (95% CI 72.7-82.1) with everolimus and 77.0% (95% CI 72.1-81.1) with placebo. Common grade 3/4 AEs with everolimus were neutropenia, stomatitis, and decreased CD4 lymphocytes. Conclusions Adjuvant everolimus did not improve DFS in patients already in PET/CT-confirmed CR. Future approaches should incorporate targeted agents such as everolimus with R-CHOP rather than as adjuvant therapy after CR has been obtained. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00790036.

中文翻译:

高危弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的佐剂依维莫司:PILLAR-2随机III期试验的最终结果。

背景国际预后指数(IPI)≥3的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者对基于利妥昔单抗的一线化疗(R-chemo)一线反应完全缓解(CR)后,复发的风险较高。依维莫司在淋巴瘤中具有单药活性。PILLAR-2旨在通过1年佐剂依维莫司改善无病生存期(DFS)。患者和方法将高危(IPI≥3)DLBCL且经正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描确认的一线R化疗的CR患者随机分为1年依维莫司10 mg /天或安慰剂。主要终点是DFS。次要终点是总体生存期,淋巴瘤特异性生存期和安全性。结果2009年8月至2013年12月,将742例患者随机分为依维莫司(n = 372)或安慰剂(n = 370)。随访的中位数为50。4个月(范围24.0-76.9)。总体而言,47%的患者≥65岁,男性的50%,IPI为4或5的患者42%。分别完成了依维莫司和安慰剂的IP分别为48%和67%。依维莫司停药与安慰剂停药的主要原因是不良事件(不良事件; 30%对12%)和疾病复发(6%对13%)。与安慰剂相比,依维莫司没有显着改善DFS(危险比0.92; 95%CI 0.69-1.22; P = 0.276)。依维莫司的两年DFS率为77.8%(95%CI 72.7-82.1),安慰剂为77.0%(95%CI 72.1-81.1)。依维莫司常见的3/4级AE包括中性粒细胞减少,口腔炎和CD4淋巴细胞减少。结论佐剂依维莫司不能改善已经接受PET / CT确诊的CR患者的DFS。未来的方法应将靶向药物(例如依维莫司)与R-CHOP合并,而不是在获得CR后作为辅助治疗。ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00790036。
更新日期:2017-12-15
down
wechat
bug