当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ann. Intern. Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Annals for Educators - 5 December 2017
Annals of Internal Medicine ( IF 19.6 ) Pub Date : 2017-12-05 , DOI: 10.7326/afed201712050
Darren B. Taichman

Image: annals_for_educators_logo_email.png

Clinical Practice Points

46-Year Trends in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Mortality in the United States, 1968 to 2013. A Nationwide Population-Based Study

Image: comp-mk.png
Diagnostic and treatment advances in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have resulted in improved 5- and 10-year survival rates. This study describes trends in SLE mortality rates in the United States over a 46-year period.
Use this study to:
  • Start and end a teaching session with multiple-choice questions. We've provided 2 below!

  • Ask your learners to list the ways SLE might present. How is the diagnosis established? Use the information in DynaMed Plus: Systemic lupus erythematosus, a benefit of your ACP membership.

  • What are the potential complications of SLE? Which ones are life-threatening?

  • Teach at the bedside! Identify a patient on the medical service with SLE, and ask whether she or he would be willing (and even would appreciate) talking to your team about how SLE has affected her or his life. What has been the worst part? What has not been as bad as expected? Are your learners surprised by which manifestations of this disease are most troublesome in the patient's daily life?

  • How is SLE treated?

  • Look at the Figure in this paper with your learners. How do they interpret these findings? What do they tell us about our ability to manage the complications of SLE? Are your learners surprised by the sex, racial, and geographic discrepancies in mortality rates seen in Table 3? Why or why not?

Functional Impairment and Decline in Middle Age. A Cohort Study

Image: comp-mk.png
Image: comp-pc.png
Image: comp-ics.png
Functional impairments, or limitations in performing activities of daily living (ADLs), are common among middle-aged adults. This article presents data on the incidence and clinical course of functional impairments among community-dwelling, middle-aged adults in the United States.
Use this study to:
  • Ask your learners to list ADLs and instrumental ADLs (IADLs). They are listed in the “Measures” subsection of the paper's Methods section.

  • Ask your learners how often they think middle-aged adults develop ADL impairments. Look at Figure 2. Are your learners surprised by these data?

  • Explore the interactive graphic that accompanies this paper. This allows your learners to visualize what happens to a group of people who have anywhere from 0 to 5 impairments. How many recover and become independent again? How many become and remain dependent?

  • Do your learners ask their patients about ADLs and IADLs? Should they? Why do they matter? Have your learners ask each of their patients about ADLs and IADLs before your next meeting. What did they learn? Were they surprised? Why don't we focus on these more routinely?

  • How can we help our patients with ADLs? Invite a rehabilitation physician to join your discussion. Invite an occupational therapist to talk to your team about what they do with patients and which types of impairments are more or less amenable to interventions.

Beyond the Guidelines

Should This Patient Receive Aspirin? Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Image: comp-mk.png
Image: comp-pc.png
Image: comp-ics.png
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has concluded that for adults aged 50 to 59 years with a 10-year risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) of 10% or greater, the benefit of aspirin for both CVD and colorectal cancer prevention moderately outweighs the risk for harm. Here, 2 experts discuss whether to recommend aspirin for a 57-year-old man who has a CVD risk greater than 10% but has concerns about gastrointestinal side effects.
Use this feature to:
  • Read the first 4 paragraphs of this paper with your learners for a summary of Mr. C's clinical issue. Then, watch the brief video interview with Mr. C.

  • Ask your learners each of the questions posed to the Beyond the Guidelines discussants: What are the potential benefits of daily low-dose aspirin, and how long do you need to take aspirin to achieve those benefits? What are the potential harms? How do you balance benefits and harms to individualize a risk-based decision for Mr. C in particular and for patients in general?

  • Now, review the answers of the discussants by either reviewing the paper (use the provided slides) or watching the video of the Grand Rounds presentations. Have your learners altered their opinions?

  • Answer the multiple-choice questions, and log on to enter your answers and earn CME/MOC credit for yourself!

In the Clinic

Image: itc_logo.gif

In the Clinic: Dyslipidemia

Image: comp-mk.png
Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for coronary artery disease and stroke. Long-term, prospective epidemiologic studies have consistently shown that persons with healthier lifestyles and fewer risk factors for coronary heart disease, particularly those with favorable lipid profiles, have reduced incidence of coronary heart disease. Prevention and sensible management of dyslipidemia can markedly alter cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Are your learners ready?
Use this paper to:
  • Ask your learners whether they screen their patients for dyslipidemia. Which ones?

  • How should screening be performed? Should a fasting lipid panel be used? Should triglycerides be measured? How should the results be interpreted?

  • Ask your learners which drugs can cause dyslipidemia.

  • What behavioral modifications should be recommended? How do your learners choose therapy? Use the Table to help review options with your learners.

  • What are the goals of treatment, and how should patients be monitored? Is repeated testing necessary?

  • How will your learners counsel patients who are concerned about medication adverse effects? What will they say to a patient who wants to use alternative or complementary therapies?

  • Download the teaching slide set. Use the provided multiple-choice questions to help introduce topics during a teaching session. And, log on to enter your answers and earn CME/MOC credit for yourself!

Humanism and Professionalism

Annals Graphic Medicine - Dear Doctor II

Image: comp-p.png
Image: annals_graphic_medicine_logo.png
KC expresses outrage at the insensitive behavior of the emergency room physician. How could things have gone so wrong?
Use this feature to:
  • Look at the cartoon (yes, a cartoon in a serious medical journal) with your learners.

  • Ask whether they believe the emergency room physician is likely to be as callous as he seemed to his patient's family members. Does it matter whether he meant to be rude? Is there another side to the story? The author makes clear that other members of the emergency department team were wonderful.

  • Do your learners think that their behavior has ever inadvertently offended patients or their families? What can we do to prevent this?

On Being a Patient

Terminal

Denial

Image: comp-p.png
Image: comp-ics.png
In the first essay, Dr. Lederle describes his thoughts on “coming to terms” with his terminal diagnosis. In the second essay, Dr. Saxe reflects on how her own malignancies and her mother's dementia shattered her “protective wall of denial.”
Use these essays to:
  • Listen to an audio recording of each, read by Drs. Michael LaCombe and Virginia Hood.

  • Ask your learners whether hearing about a physician's devastating diagnosis affects them differently from hearing such news about a patient or a family member. Why?

  • Do we learn to put up walls between ourselves and our patients? In what ways are they detrimental? Are they useful in some way? Are there solutions to these opposing effects?

  • Do we all have to endure an illness ourselves or with a family member to shatter the wall?

MKSAP 17 Question 1

A 30-year-old woman is evaluated during a follow-up visit for systemic lupus erythematosus. She was diagnosed 3 months ago after presenting with pericarditis and arthritis. She was initially treated with prednisone, 40 mg/d, with improvement of her presenting symptoms. The prednisone has been tapered over 3 months to her current dose of 10 mg/d with no recurrence. She also takes vitamin D and a calcium supplement.
On physical examination, vital signs are normal. BMI is 25. Cardiac examination is normal. There is no evidence of arthritis. The remainder of the examination is normal.
Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in treating this patient?
A. Add azathioprine
B. Add hydroxychloroquine
C. Add mycophenolate mofetil
D. Add a scheduled NSAID
Correct Answer
B. Add hydroxychloroquine
Educational Objective
Treat mild systemic lupus erythematosus.
Critique
Hydroxychloroquine is an appropriate agent to address milder systemic manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) such as arthritis and pericarditis, and it can act as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent. All patients with SLE who can tolerate it should be taking hydroxychloroquine. Antimalarial therapy such as hydroxychloroquine in SLE has documented benefit for reducing disease activity, improving survival, and reducing the risk of SLE-related thrombosis and myocardial infarction.
Azathioprine is generally reserved for more severe manifestations of SLE not responsive to low-dose prednisone and hydroxychloroquine but can be associated with serious toxicity. Azathioprine has generally been supplanted by the use of mycophenolate mofetil in SLE.
Mycophenolate mofetil may be appropriate for this patient if she had more serious disease activity such as nephritis or if her arthritis or pericarditis recurred while taking hydroxychloroquine.
NSAIDs, often with colchicine, are first-line therapy for most patients with pericarditis, although glucocorticoids may be indicated in patients with pericarditis associated with a systemic inflammatory disease such as in this patient. However, there is no indication to start an NSAID now given resolution of her symptoms, and doing so would increase her risk of gastrointestinal complications if used along with her daily glucocorticoid.
Key Point
Antimalarial therapy such as hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has documented benefit for reducing disease activity, improving survival, and reducing the risk of SLE-related thrombosis and myocardial infarction.
Bibliography
Lee SJ, Silverman E, Bargman JM. The role of antimalarial agents in the treatment of SLE and lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011 Oct 18;7(12):718-29.

MKSAP 17 Question 2

A 35-year-old woman is evaluated for weakness in the right foot and left wrist with paresthesia in the right leg, right foot, left forearm, and left hand. She also reports facial erythema and joint stiffness. She has a 6-year history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Medications are hydroxychloroquine, prednisone, vitamin D, and calcium.
On physical examination, vital signs are normal. There is a new malar rash. Swelling of the second through fourth metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands is present. There is dorsiflexion weakness of the right ankle and a left wrist drop. Reflexes are normal. The remainder of the examination is normal.
Laboratory studies indicate that her SLE appears to be active with an elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate compared with baseline, leukopenia, and anemia typical of her previous SLE flares.
Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
A. Discontinue hydroxychloroquine
B. Obtain electromyography/nerve conduction studies
C. Obtain MRI of the cervical spine
D. Obtain skin biopsy for small-fiber neuropathy
Correct Answer
B. Obtain electromyography/nerve conduction studies
Educational Objective
Evaluate a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus who has developed mononeuritis multiplex.
Critique
Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) are appropriate for this patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who most likely has mononeuritis multiplex. Mononeuritis multiplex is characterized by abnormal findings in the territory of two or more nerves in separate parts of the body. She has a foot drop with normal reflexes that suggests an injury to the peroneal nerve and wrist drop that suggests injury to the radial nerve. EMG/NCS would most likely document a peripheral neuropathy. Mononeuritis multiplex is highly specific for vasculitic disorders that affect the vasa vasorum or nerve vascular supply but can also occur in systemic inflammatory disorders such as SLE. The peroneal nerve is the most commonly affected nerve. Approximately 14% of patients with SLE have a peripheral neuropathy with the majority (60%) due to SLE. Risk factors for the development of SLE-associated peripheral neuropathy include moderate to severe disease and the presence of other neuropsychiatric SLE manifestations. Approximately two thirds of patients improve with more aggressive immunosuppression. EMG/NCS can identify a nerve (usually the sural nerve) that might be amenable to biopsy to document the vasculitis prior to aggressive immunosuppression.
Hydroxychloroquine can cause a neuromyopathy manifested by proximal muscle weakness and areflexia. Biopsy demonstrates vacuoles in the muscle cells. However, hydroxychloroquine has not been associated with mononeuritis multiplex.
SLE may rarely cause transverse myelitis, which is characterized by a rapidly progressing paraparesis associated with a sensory level. Autonomic symptoms, including increased urinary urgency, bladder and bowel incontinence, and sexual dysfunction, may be present. The patient has no symptoms suggesting transverse myelitis, and a spine MRI is not indicated.
A small-fiber neuropathy causes a burning pain in the extremities and has been associated with autoimmune diseases such as SLE but does not cause motor symptoms. Diagnosis is made by skin biopsy, which demonstrates a reduced density of small sensory nerve fibers in the skin.
Key Point
Mononeuritis multiplex is characterized by abnormal findings in the territory of two or more nerves in separate parts of the body and is highly specific for vasculitis but can occur in systemic inflammatory disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus.
Bibliography
Florica B, Aghdassi E, Su J, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;41(2):203-11.
Do you like reading Annals for Educators? Receive it direct to your inbox. Sign up for the Annals for Educators alert today.


中文翻译:

教育家年鉴-2017年12月5日

图片:annals_for_educators_logo_email.png

临床实践要点

1968年至2013年,美国系统性红斑狼疮死亡率的46年趋势。一项基于全国人口的研究

图片:comp-mk.png
系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的诊断和治疗进展已提高了5年和10年生存率。这项研究描述了美国46年期间SLE死亡率的趋势。
使用此研究可以:
  • 通过选择题开始和结束教学课程。我们在下面提供了2个!

  • 让您的学习者列出SLE的呈现方式。如何确定诊断?使用DynaMed Plus:系统性红斑狼疮中的信息,这是ACP成员资格的一项好处。

  • SLE的潜在并发症有哪些?哪些威胁生命?

  • 在床边教书!确定患有SLE的医疗服务患者,并询问她或他是否愿意(甚至会感激)与您的团队讨论SLE如何影响她或他的生活。最糟糕的部分是什么?有没有像预期的那样糟糕?您的学习者会对这种疾病在患者的日常生活中最麻烦的表现感到惊讶吗?

  • SLE如何治疗?

  • 与您的学习者一起看一下本文中的图。他们如何解释这些发现?他们如何告诉我们我们处理SLE并发症的能力?您的学习者是否对表3所示的死亡率中的性别,种族和地理差异感到惊讶?为什么或者为什么不?

中世纪的功能障碍和衰退。队列研究

图片:comp-mk.png
图片:comp-pc.png
图片:comp-ics.png
在中年成年人中,功能障碍或日常生活活动能力(ADL)的局限性很普遍。本文介绍了在美国社区居住的中年成年人中功能障碍的发生率和临床过程的数据。
使用此研究可以:
  • 要求您的学习者列出ADL和工具性ADL(IADL)。它们在本文的“方法”部分的“度量”小节中列出。

  • 向您的学习者询问他们认为中年成年人多久发展一次ADL障碍。请看图2。您的学习者对这些数据感到惊讶吗?

  • 探索本文随附的交互式图形。这使您的学习者可以直观地看到一群有0到5个障碍的人所发生的情况。有多少人康复并再次独立?有多少人成为并保持依赖?

  • 您的学习者是否向患者询问有关ADL和IADL的信息?应该吗 他们为什么重要?在下一次会议之前,让学习者向他们的每位患者询问有关ADL和IADL的信息。他们学到了什么?他们感到惊讶吗?为什么我们不更常规地关注这些?

  • 我们如何为患有ADL的患者提供帮助?邀请康复医生参加您的讨论。邀请职业治疗师与您的团队讨论他们对患者的处理方式以及哪些类型的损伤或多或少适合进行干预。

超越准则

该患者应接受阿司匹林治疗吗?贝丝以色列女执事医疗中心举行的大回合讨论

图片:comp-mk.png
图片:comp-pc.png
图片:comp-ics.png
美国预防服务工作队得出的结论是,对于50岁至59岁,心血管疾病(CVD)十年风险为10%或更高的成年人,阿司匹林在CVD和预防结肠直肠癌方面的益处均会适度地超过伤害。在这里,两位专家讨论了是否应该为CVD风险大于10%但担心胃肠道副作用的57岁男性推荐阿司匹林。
使用此功能可以:
  • 与您的学习者阅读本文的前四段,以总结C先生的临床问题。然后,观看对C先生的简短视频采访。

  • 向您的学习者询问“超越准则”讨论者的每个问题:每日低剂量阿司匹林的潜在益处是什么?您需要服用多长时间才能获得这些益处?潜在的危害是什么?您如何平衡利益和伤害,以针对C先生和一般患者制定基于风险的决策?

  • 现在,通过查看论文(使用提供的幻灯片)或观看大回合演示文稿的视频来查看讨论者的答案。您的学习者是否改变了看法?

  • 回答多项选择题,然后登录以输入答案,并为自己赚取CME / MOC积分!

在诊所

图片:itc_logo.gif

在临床中:血脂异常

图片:comp-mk.png
血脂异常是冠状动脉疾病和中风的重要危险因素。长期的前瞻性流行病学研究一致表明,生活方式更健康,冠心病危险因素较少的人,尤其是脂质谱良好的人,降低了冠心病的发病率。血脂异常的预防和合理处理可以显着改变心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率。您的学习者准备好了吗?
使用本文可以:
  • 询问您的学习者是否对患者进行血脂异常筛查。哪个?

  • 应该如何进行筛查?是否应使用空腹血脂检查组?应该测量甘油三酸酯吗?结果应该如何解释?

  • 询问您的学习者哪些药物可导致血脂异常。

  • 应该建议哪些行为修改?您的学习者如何选择治疗方法?使用表格可帮助您的学习者复习选项。

  • 治疗的目标是什么?应如何监测患者?是否需要重复测试?

  • 您的学习者将如何为担心药物不良反应的患者提供咨询?他们会对想要使用替代疗法或补充疗法的患者说些什么?

  • 下载教学幻灯片组。使用提供的多项选择题帮助在教学中介绍主题。并且,登录以输入您的答案并为自己赚取CME / MOC积分!

人文主义和专业精神

年鉴图形医学-亲爱的医生II

图片:comp-p.png
图片:annals_graphic_medicine_logo.png
KC对急诊室医师的麻木行为表示愤慨。事情怎么可能出了这么差呢?
使用此功能可以:
  • 与您的学习者一起看动画片(是的,是严肃医学杂志上的动画片)。

  • 询问他们是否认为急诊室医师可能像他对病人的家人所表示的那样冷酷无情。他是否要无礼没关系吗?故事还有另一面吗?作者明确指出,急诊团队的其他成员也很棒。

  • 您的学习者是否认为自己的行为曾无意中冒犯了患者或其家人?我们该怎么做才能防止这种情况发生?

成为患者

终端

否认

图片:comp-p.png
图片:comp-ics.png
在第一篇文章中,Lederle博士在末期诊断中描述了他对“达成共识”的想法。在第二篇文章中,萨克斯博士反思了她自己的恶性肿瘤和母亲的痴呆症如何打破了她的“保护性否认墙”。
使用这些论文来:
  • 聆听每位医生的录音。迈克尔·拉科姆(Michael LaCombe)和弗吉尼亚·胡德(Virginia Hood)。

  • 询问您的学习者与听到有关患者或家庭成员的新闻是否对医生造成毁灭性的诊断有不同的影响。为什么?

  • 我们是否学会在自己和患者之间建立隔离墙?它们以什么方式有害?它们在某种程度上有用吗?是否有解决这些不利影响的方法?

  • 我们所有人都必须忍受疾病还是自己或家人忍受挫折?

MKSAP 17问题1

在随访期间对一名30岁女性进行了系统性红斑狼疮评估。在出现心包炎和关节炎后的3个月前,她被确诊。她最初接受泼尼松40 mg / d的治疗,症状有所改善。泼尼松已在3个月内逐渐缩小至目前的剂量10 mg / d,且无复发。她还服用维生素D和钙补充剂。
经身体检查,生命体征正常。BMI是25。心脏检查是正常的。没有关节炎的证据。其余检查正常。
以下哪项是治疗该患者最合适的下一步?
A.添加硫唑嘌呤
B.添加羟氯喹
C.添加霉酚酸酯
D.添加预定的NSAID
正确答案
B.添加羟氯喹
教育目标
治疗轻度系统性红斑狼疮。
批判
羟氯喹是用于治疗全身性红斑狼疮(SLE)的较轻的全身表现(如关节炎和心包炎)的合适药物,并且它可以作为糖皮质激素的保护剂。所有可以耐受的SLE患者都应服用羟氯喹。SLE中的抗疟疾治疗(例如羟氯喹)已证明对减少疾病活动,改善生存率以及减少与SLE相关的血栓形成和心肌梗塞的风险具有好处。
硫唑嘌呤通常保留用于SLE的更严重表现,对低剂量泼尼松和羟氯喹无反应,但可能与严重毒性相关。硫唑嘌呤通常已通过在SLE中使用霉酚酸酯代替了。
如果患者患有更严重的疾病活动,例如肾炎,或者服用羟氯喹时复发了关节炎或心包炎,则霉酚酸酯可能适合该患者。
对于大多数心包炎患者,NSAIDs通常与秋水仙碱一起使用,是一线治疗,尽管在与全身性炎性疾病相关的心包炎患者中可能提示糖皮质激素,例如在该患者中。但是,鉴于已缓解症状,目前没有迹象表明可以开始使用NSAID,如果将其与每日使用的糖皮质激素一起使用,这样做会增加其发生胃肠道并发症的风险。
重点
已证明抗疟疾疗法,例如系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)中的羟氯喹,对降低疾病活动性,改善生存率以及减少与SLE相关的血栓形成和心肌梗塞的风险具有好处。
参考书目
Lee SJ,Silverman E和Bargman JM。抗疟药在治疗SLE和狼疮肾炎中的作用。Nat Rev Nephrol。2011年10月18日; 7(12):718-29。

MKSAP 17问题2

评估一名35岁妇女的右脚和左腕无力,右腿,右脚,左前臂和左手感觉异常。她还报告面部红斑和关节僵硬。她有6年的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)病史。药物是羟氯喹,泼尼松,维生素D和钙。
经身体检查,生命体征正常。有新的黄斑疹。存在手的第二至第四掌指关节肿胀。右脚踝背屈肌无力,左腕腕下降。反射正常。其余检查正常。
实验室研究表明,与基线,白细胞减少症和以前的SLE发作时典型的贫血相比,她的SLE似乎活跃并且红细胞沉降率升高。
以下哪项是管理中最合适的下一步?
A.终止羟基氯喹
B.获得肌电图/神经传导研究
C.获得颈椎MRI
D.进行皮肤活检以获取小纤维神经病变
正确答案
B.获得肌电图/神经传导研究
教育目标
评估患有单发性多发性神经炎的系统性红斑狼疮患者。
批判
肌电图(EMG)和神经传导研究(NCS)适用于最可能患有多发性单神经炎的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者。单发性神经炎的特征是在身体不同部位的两条或更多条神经区域出现异常发现。她的脚下降时反射正常,提示腓神经受伤;腕部下降提示drop神经受伤。EMG / NCS最有可能证明周围神经病变。多重性单神经炎炎对影响血管脉管或神经血管供应的血管疾病高度特异,但也可能在全身性炎性疾病(例如SLE)中发生。腓神经是最常受累的神经。大约14%的SLE患者患有周围神经病变,其中大部分(60%)由于SLE而引起。与SLE相关的周围神经病变发展的危险因素包括中度至重度疾病以及其他神经精神病性SLE表现。大约三分之二的患者通过更积极的免疫抑制而改善。EMG / NCS可以识别出可能需要进行活检以在主动免疫抑制之前记录血管炎的神经(通常是腓肠神经)。
羟氯喹可引起神经肌病,表现为近端肌肉无力和反射力减退。活检显示肌肉细胞中有空泡。然而,羟氯喹尚未与多发性单神经炎相关。
SLE很少会引起横断性脊髓炎,其特征是与感觉水平相关的快速进行的轻瘫。可能会出现自主神经症状,包括尿急,膀胱和肠道小便失禁以及性功能障碍。该患者无任何症状,提示横贯性脊髓炎,且未显示脊柱MRI。
小纤维神经病会导致四肢灼痛,并与自身免疫性疾病(如SLE)有关,但不会引起运动症状。通过皮肤活检进行诊断,这表明皮肤中小感觉神经纤维的密度降低。
重点
单发性神经炎的特征是在身体不同部位的两条或更多条神经区域出现异常现象,对脉管炎具有高度特异性,但在全身性炎性疾病(如系统性红斑狼疮)中也可能发生。
参考书目
Florica B,Aghdassi E,Su J等。系统性红斑狼疮患者的周围神经病变。精囊性关节炎大黄。2011年10月; 41(2):203-11。
你喜欢读《教育家年鉴》吗?直接将其接收到您的收件箱中。立即注册“教育者年鉴”警报。
更新日期:2017-12-05
down
wechat
bug