In our response, we review and address the comments on our target article made in the 25 commentaries. First, we review and discuss the commentaries that recognized the value of our approach, accepted the main premises and conclusions of our target article, and suggested further avenues for research on attractiveness-related biases. We then respond to commentators who either misinterpreted some parts of our target article or made statements with which we disagree. These commentaries provided us with an opportunity to clarify some aspects of our target article, for example, the fact that we address both the functional significance of attractiveness-related biases and their underlying mechanisms. We provide a rebuttal to two commentaries, in which we are accused of poor scholarship. We conclude our response by addressing two commentaries that discussed the societal implications of the occurrence of attractiveness-related biases in the labor market by briefly discussing the relationship between scientific research and social policy.

中文翻译：

---

推进关于吸引力相关偏见的跨学科研究

在我们的回复中，我们审查并解决了 25 条评论中对我们目标文章的评论。首先，我们回顾和讨论认可我们方法的价值的评论，接受我们目标文章的主要前提和结论，并建议研究吸引力相关偏见的进一步途径。然后，我们会回应评论员，他们要么误解了我们目标文章的某些部分，要么发表了我们不同意的声明。这些评论为我们提供了澄清目标文章某些方面的机会，例如，我们解决了与吸引力相关的偏见的功能意义及其潜在机制的事实。我们反驳了两篇评论，其中我们被指责为学术不佳。