当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Lancet Psychiatry
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
No doubts about dementia advocacy.
The Lancet Psychiatry ( IF 30.8 ) Pub Date : 2017-10-03 , DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30373-5 William T Hu 1
The Lancet Psychiatry ( IF 30.8 ) Pub Date : 2017-10-03 , DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30373-5 William T Hu 1
Affiliation
In his Comment in The Lancet Psychiatry, Robert Howard1 bravely shared his personal questions on the diagnostic uncertainty of some dementia advocates, and I suspect others might be similarly perplexed. I would like to provide some personal observations from the USA to narrow the gap between the purely medical model of dementia and the lived experience of Persons with Dementia.
中文翻译:
毫无疑问对痴呆症的倡导。
罗伯特·霍华德( Robert Howard 1)在《柳叶刀精神病学》(The Lancet Psychiatry)中的评论中,勇敢地分享了他对某些痴呆症拥护者的诊断不确定性的个人问题,我怀疑其他人可能同样困惑。我想提供一些来自美国的个人观察,以缩小痴呆症的纯粹医学模型与痴呆症患者的实际经历之间的差距。
更新日期:2017-10-04
中文翻译:
毫无疑问对痴呆症的倡导。
罗伯特·霍华德( Robert Howard 1)在《柳叶刀精神病学》(The Lancet Psychiatry)中的评论中,勇敢地分享了他对某些痴呆症拥护者的诊断不确定性的个人问题,我怀疑其他人可能同样困惑。我想提供一些来自美国的个人观察,以缩小痴呆症的纯粹医学模型与痴呆症患者的实际经历之间的差距。