The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused by our conclusion on the frequency of lightning flashes of different types terminated by Thunderstorm Ground Enhancements (TGEs) and that TGEs associated with inverted IC flashes and hybrid flashes caused relatively small particle flux drops (Chilingarian et al., 2020). We recently analyzed different types of lightning flashes that terminate TGEs using a significantly enlarged data sample (163 TGE events instead of 49) observed from 2012 to 2021 (Soghomonyan et al., 2021). Our analysis of this three times larger dataset has led to results that do not support some of our previous conclusions based on smaller statistics. Therefore, we present a new analysis of the expanded database and compare our previous and current findings on the relationship between particle fluxes and lightning discharges.

中文翻译：

---

“通过反向云内和混合闪电放电终止与雷暴相关的高能辐射和粒子爆发”的勘误 [大气研究，233 (2020), 104713-104720]

作者对我们对雷暴地面增强 (TGE) 终止的不同类型闪电频率的结论所造成的任何不便表示歉意，并且与倒置 IC 闪光和混合闪光相关的 TGE 导致相对较小的粒子通量下降（Chilingarian 等人）等，2020）。我们最近使用 2012 年至 2021 年观察到的显着扩大的数据样本（163 个 TGE 事件而不是 49 个）分析了终止 TGE 的不同类型的闪电（Soghomonyan 等人，2021）。我们对这个大三倍的数据集的分析得出的结果并不支持我们之前基于较小统计数据得出的一些结论。因此，我们对扩展数据库进行了新的分析，并比较了我们之前和当前关于粒子通量与闪电放电之间关系的发现。