Videos on Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) may be watched by surgeons learning RPD. This study sought to appraise the educational quality of RPD videos on YouTube. One-hundred videos showing RPD or ‘Robotic Whipple’ were assessed using validated scales (LAP-VEGaS & Consensus Statement Score (CSS)). The association between the scores and the video characteristics (e.g. order of appearance, provider type etc) was assessed. The minimum number of videos required to cumulatively cover the entire LAP-VEGaS and CSS was also noted. The videos were of variable quality; median LAP-VEGaS = 0.67 (0.17−0.94), median CSS = 0.45 (0.29−0.53). There was no association between the educational quality of the videos and their order of appearance, view counts, provider type, length or country of origin. Videos lacked information such as patient consent (100%), potential pitfalls (97%) or surgeon credentials (84%). The first 29 videos cumulatively met all the criteria of CSS and LAP-VEGaS scores except for reporting consent. YouTube videos on RPD are of variable quality, without any recognised predictors of quality, and miss important safety information. An impractical number of videos need to be watched to cumulatively fulfil educational criteria. There is a need for high-quality, peer-reviewed videos that adhere to educational principles.

中文翻译：

---

YouTube 上的机器人 Whipple 视频的教育质量

学习 RPD 的外科医生可以观看有关机器人胰十二指肠切除术 (RPD) 的视频。本研究旨在评估 YouTube 上 RPD 视频的教育质量。使用经过验证的量表（LAP-VEGaS 和共识声明评分 (CSS)）对一百个显示 RPD 或“机器人 Whipple”的视频进行了评估。评估分数和视频特征（例如出现顺序、提供者类型等）之间的关联。还指出了累计覆盖整个 LAP-VEGaS 和 CSS 所需的最低视频数量。视频质量参差不齐；中位 LAP-VEGaS = 0.67 (0.17−0.94)，中位 CSS = 0.45 (0.29−0.53)。视频的教育质量与其出现顺序、观看次数、提供者类型、长度或原产国之间没有关联。视频缺乏患者同意（100%）、潜在陷阱（97%）或外科医生资质（84%）等信息。前 29 个视频累计满足 CSS 和 LAP-VEGaS 评分的所有标准（报告同意除外）。RPD 上的 YouTube 视频质量参差不齐，没有任何公认的质量预测指标，并且会错过重要的安全信息。需要观看不切实际的视频数量才能累积满足教育标准。需要遵循教育原则的高质量、经过同行评审的视频。