The Nutritious Eating with Soul study was a 24-month, randomized behavioral nutrition intervention among African American adults. This present study, which is a secondary analysis of the NEW Soul study, examined changes in dietary acceptability, restraint, disinhibition, and hunger. Participants (n = 159; 79% female, 74% with ≥ college degree, mean age 48.4 y) were randomized to either a soul food vegan (n = 77) or soul food omnivorous (n = 82) diet and participated in a two-year behavioral nutrition intervention. Questionnaires assessing dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire; FAQ) and dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire; TFEQ) were completed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Mixed models were specified with main effects (group and time) and interaction effects (group by time) to estimate mean differences in FAQ and TFEQ scores using intent-to-treat analysis. After adjusting for employment, education, food security status, sex, and age, there were no differences in any of the FAQ items, total FAQ score, dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger at any timepoint except for one item of the FAQ at 12 months. Participants in the vegan group reported a greater increase in satisfaction after eating a meal than the omnivorous group (mean difference 0.80 ± 0.32, 95% CI 0.18, 1.42; P = 0.01). This is one of the first studies to examine differences in dietary acceptability, hunger, and other eating factors among African American adults randomized to either a vegan or omnivorous soul food diet. The findings highlight that plant-based eating styles are equally acceptable to omnivorous eating patterns and have similar changes in hunger, restraint, and disinhibition. These results suggest that plant-based eating styles can be an acceptable dietary pattern to recommend for cardiovascular disease prevention and may result in greater post-meal satisfaction.

中文翻译：

---

随机接受纯素食或杂食性灵魂食物饮食的非裔美国参与者在饮食可接受性、克制、去抑制和饥饿方面的差异

“灵魂营养饮食”研究是一项针对非裔美国成年人进行的为期 24 个月的随机行为营养干预研究。本研究是对 NEW Soul 研究的二次分析，研究了饮食可接受性、克制、去抑制和饥饿的变化。参与者（n = 159；79% 为女性，74% 拥有大学以上学历，平均年龄 48.4 岁）被随机分为灵魂食物纯素食 (n = 77) 或灵魂食物杂食 (n = 82) 饮食，并参加两次年行为营养干预。在基线、3、6、12 和 24 个月时完成了评估饮食可接受性（食物可接受性问卷；FAQ）以及饮食限制、去抑制和饥饿（三因素饮食问卷；TFEQ）的调查问卷。混合模型指定了主效应（组和时间）和交互效应（按时间分组），以使用意向治疗分析来估计 FAQ 和 TFEQ 评分的平均差异。在对就业、教育、粮食安全状况、性别和年龄进行调整后，除了 12 点的常见问题解答项目外，任何时间点的任何常见问题解答项目、常见问题解答总分、饮食限制、去抑制和饥饿都没有差异。几个月。纯素食组的参与者报告说，进餐后的满意度比杂食组有更大的提高（平均差 0.80 ± 0.32，95% CI 0.18，1.42；P = 0.01）。这是首批研究随机接受纯素或杂食性灵魂食物饮食的非裔美国成年人的饮食可接受性、饥饿和其他饮食因素差异的研究之一。研究结果强调，植物性饮食方式与杂食性饮食方式同样可以接受，并且在饥饿、克制和去抑制方面有类似的变化。这些结果表明，植物性饮食方式可以成为预防心血管疾病的可接受的饮食模式，并可能带来更高的餐后满意度。