Fellows completing the Clinical Anatomy Fellowship at Kansas City University assist Anatomy faculty in the Gross Anatomy laboratory, complete robust research projects, and support other departments. The program's positive impact on participants has been reported; however, the impact on individuals interfacing with Fellows has not been investigated. A follow-up, survey-based (Likert scale, multiple-choice, open-ended) study was conducted to evaluate faculty, staff, and student perceptions of the program. Ninety-five percent of surveyed faculty and staff (n = 22) perceived the Fellows as beneficial to students, faculty, and the university (p < 0.05) by acting as role models (95%) and mentors (90%), contributing to educational processes (90%), and reducing faculty work burden (81%) (p < 0.05). Student responses (n = 95) were also positive: 97% perceived interactions with Fellows as beneficial (p < 0.05). A passion for Anatomy (mean, 4.6; p < 0.05) and the opportunity to increase competitiveness for residency (mean, 4.5; p < 0.05) were the most important factors driving interest in the Fellowship (Cronbach's alpha, 0.766). In contrast, diverting a year from the school's curriculum (mean, 4.4; p < 0.05) and delaying clinical experiences (mean, 4.3; p < 0.05) were the most important deterrents (Cronbach's alpha, 0.505). Additionally, the financial investment required by the program is lower than that associated with hiring full-time faculty. Analysis comparing employment of Fellows versus associate-level faculty identified annual net savings of $370,000. Not only does the Fellowship augment faculty and student experiences at the university, but it also allows for substantial cost savings. Collectively, these data are evidence for other health professional institutions to consider adopting a similar program.

中文翻译：

---

临床解剖学奖学金：彻底改变教师和学生的课程体验

在堪萨斯城大学完成临床解剖学奖学金的研究员协助大体解剖实验室的解剖学教师，完成强大的研究项目，并支持其他部门。据报道，该计划对参与者产生了积极影响；然而，尚未调查对与研究员互动的个人的影响。进行了一项基于调查的后续研究（李克特量表、多项选择、开放式），以评估教职员工和学生对该项目的看法。 95% 的接受调查的教职员工 ( n = 22) 认为研究员 通过充当榜样 (95%) 和导师 (90%) 对学生、教职员工和大学有益 ( p < 0.05)，为教育过程（90%），并减少教师的工作负担（81%）（p  < 0.05）。学生的反应 ( n  = 95) 也很积极：97% 认为与研究员的互动是有益的 ( p  < 0.05)。对解剖学的热情（平均值，4.6；p  < 0.05）和提高住院医师竞争力的机会（平均值，4.5；p  < 0.05）是推动对奖学金感兴趣的最重要因素（Cronbach's alpha，0.766）。相比之下，偏离学校课程一年（平均值，4.4；p  < 0.05）和延迟临床经验（平均值，4.3；p  < 0.05）是最重要的阻碍因素（Cronbach's alpha，0.505）。此外，该项目所需的财务投资低于雇用全职教师的相关投资。对研究员和副教授的雇用进行比较分析发现，每年净节省 370,000 美元。该奖学金不仅可以增强教师和学生在大学的体验，还可以节省大量成本。总的来说，这些数据是其他卫生专业机构考虑采取类似计划的证据。