Commentaries on the target article offer diverse perspectives on integrative experiment design. Our responses engage three themes: (1) Disputes of our characterization of the problem, (2) skepticism toward our proposed solution, and (3) endorsement of the solution, with accompanying discussions of its implementation in existing work and its potential for other domains. Collectively, the commentaries enhance our confidence in the promise and viability of integrative experiment design, while highlighting important considerations about how it is used.

中文翻译：

---

回复《超越与自然玩耍20个问题》的评论

对目标文章的评论为综合实验设计提供了不同的观点。我们的回应涉及三个主题：(1) 对问题描述的争议，(2) 对我们提出的解决方案的怀疑，以及 (3) 对解决方案的认可，并讨论其在现有工作中的实施及其在其他领域的潜力。总的来说，这些评论增强了我们对综合实验设计的前景和可行性的信心，同时强调了如何使用它的重要考虑因素。