Integrative experiment design assumes that we can effectively design a space of factors that cause contextual variation. However, this is impossible to do so in a sufficiently objective way, resulting inevitably in observations laden with surrogate models. Consequently, integrative experiment design may even deepen the problem of incommensurability. In comparison, one-at-a-time approaches make much more tentative assumptions about the factors excluded from experiment design, hence still seem better suited to deal with incommensurability.

中文翻译：

---

排除主义归纳法不能解决心理学危机

综合实验设计假设我们可以有效地设计一系列导致情境变化的因素。然而，这是不可能以足够客观的方式做到这一点，不可避免地导致观察充满替代模型。因此，综合实验设计甚至可能加深不可通约性问题。相比之下，一次性方法对实验设计中排除的因素做出了更多的尝试性假设，因此似乎仍然更适合处理不可通约性。