当前位置: X-MOL 学术Behav. Brain. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Against naïve induction from experimental data
Behavioral and Brain Sciences ( IF 29.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-02-05 , DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x2300211x
David Kellen , Gregory E. Cox , Chris Donkin , John C. Dunn , Richard M. Shiffrin

This commentary argues against the indictment of current experimental practices such as piecemeal testing, and the proposed integrated experiment design (IED) approach, which we see as yet another attempt at automating scientific thinking. We identify a number of undesirable features of IED that lead us to believe that its broad application will hinder scientific progress.



中文翻译:

反对从实验数据中进行朴素归纳

这篇评论反对对当前实验实践(例如零碎测试)的控诉,以及提出的综合实验设计(IED)方法,我们认为这是自动化科学思维的又一尝试。我们发现了简易爆炸装置的一些不良特征,这些特征使我们相信其广泛应用将阻碍科学进步。

更新日期:2024-02-05
down
wechat
bug