Demonstrating the limitations of the one-at-a-time approach, crowd initiatives reveal the surprisingly powerful role of analytic and design choices in shaping scientific results. At the same time, cross-cultural variability in effects is far below the levels initially expected. This highlights the value of “medium” science, leveraging diverse stimulus sets and extensive robustness checks to achieve integrative tests of competing theories.

中文翻译：

---

以多种方式检验多种理论

群体倡议展示了一次性方法的局限性，揭示了分析和设计选择在塑造科学结果方面惊人的强大作用。与此同时，跨文化影响的差异远低于最初预期的水平。这凸显了“中等”科学的价值，利用不同的刺激集和广泛的稳健性检查来实现竞争理论的综合测试。