The purpose of this study is to meta-analytically evaluate research that used chemical bonding-based interventions to improve academic performance. Through meta-analysis, the present study used several keyword patterns (e.g., chemical bonding, experimental, chemistry education, science education) via relevant databases (e.g., ERIC, Springer Link, Taylor & Francis, Wiley Online Library Full Collection, and Scopus) to find chemical bonding-intervention studies. Thus, it included 50 chemical bonding-based intervention papers (15 dissertations, 32 articles, and 3 proceedings). The current meta-analysis found that the overall effect-size of chemical bonding-based intervention studies was 1.007, which shows a large effect. Findings regarding moderator analysis displayed non-significant differences between educational levels and a statistically significant difference between the intervention types. This meta-analysis reveals that the chemical bonding-based intervention studies are effective at improving the participants’ academic performance in terms of chemical bonding. Further, it denotes that when the abstract nature of chemical bonding is overlapped with the features of the intervention type, the interventions (e.g., cooperative learning and enriched learning environment with different methods) result in better academic performance. Since this study, like all meta-analyses, points out consistent and inconsistent findings among published research, further meta-analysis studies should be undertaken to resolve any contradictory findings.

中文翻译：

---

基于化学键的干预研究在提高学业成绩方面有效性的荟萃分析

本研究的目的是对使用基于化学键的干预措施来提高学业成绩的研究进行荟萃分析评估。通过荟萃分析，本研究通过相关数据库（例如，ERIC、Springer Link、Taylor & Francis、Wiley Online Library Full Collection 和 Scopus ）使用了几种关键词模式（例如，化学键合、实验、化学教育、科学教育）。寻找化学键干预研究。因此，它包括 50 篇基于化学键的干预论文（15 篇论文、32 篇文章和 3 篇论文集）。目前的荟萃分析发现，基于化学键的干预研究的总体效应大小为1.007，显示出较大的效应。有关调节分析的结果显示，教育水平之间没有显着差异，而干预类型之间存在统计显着差异。这项荟萃分析表明，基于化学键的干预研究可以有效提高参与者在化学键方面的学业成绩。此外，它还表明，当化学键的抽象性质与干预类型的特征重叠时，干预措施（例如，合作学习和使用不同方法丰富学习环境）会带来更好的学业成绩。由于本研究与所有荟萃分析一样，指出了已发表研究中一致和不一致的发现，因此应进行进一步的荟萃分析研究以解决任何矛盾的发现。