Neo-Brandeisian legal scholars have recently revived the ideas of Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, who championed state regulation that preserved market competition and economic liberty in the face of concentrated private power. Yet ultimately and perhaps paradoxically, it has been Europe and not the United States that has proved more hospitable to accommodating key features of the Brandeisian approach. We explain this outcome by tracing the evolution of EU competition law to gain insight into the social learning processes through which such regimes change over time. We argue that the EU's administrative system, which provides the European Commission with significant bureaucratic discretion, has facilitated processes of ongoing deliberative adjustment to policy and practice, which over time has resulted in a system of “regulated competition” with striking similarities to the Brandeisian vision. The analysis highlights how administrative law institutions condition how regulatory regimes evolve in response to acquired experience and knowledge.

中文翻译：

---

布兰代斯在布鲁塞尔吗？欧盟的官僚自由裁量权、社会学习和规范竞争的发展

新布兰代斯主义法律学者最近复兴了最高法院法官路易斯·布兰代斯的观点，他主张国家监管在面对集中的私人权力时维护市场竞争和经济自由。但最终，也许矛盾的是，事实证明，更愿意接受布兰代斯方法的关键特征的是欧洲，而不是美国。我们通过追踪欧盟竞争法的演变来解释这一结果，以深入了解此类制度随时间变化的社会学习过程。我们认为，欧盟的行政体系为欧盟委员会提供了重要的官僚自由裁量权，促进了对政策和实践进行持续审慎调整的过程，随着时间的推移，这形成了一个与布兰代斯愿景惊人相似的“规范竞争”体系。该分析强调了行政法机构如何根据所获得的经验和知识来调节监管制度的演变。