当前位置: X-MOL 学术Toxicol. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of different scores as predictors of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit admission in acute theophylline poisoning.
Toxicology Research ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2023-10-03 , DOI: 10.1093/toxres/tfad093
Ghada Attia Sagah 1 , Alshaimma Mahmoud Elmansy 1
Affiliation  

Background Theophylline is commonly used to control respiratory diseases, especially in developing countries. Theophylline has a narrowed therapeutic index, and its toxicity is associated with morbidity and mortality. Physicians should be aware of the early prediction of the need for intensive care unit admission (ICU) and mechanical ventilation (MV). Aim This study aimed to assess the power of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Simple Clinical Score (SCS) in predicting the need for ICU admission and/or MV in acute theophylline-poisoned patients. Patients and methods This cross-sectional study included 58 patients with acute theophylline poisoning who were admitted to our Poison Control Center from the 1st of July 2022 to the 31st of January 2023. The REMS, MEWS and SCS were calculated for all patients on arrival at the hospital. The area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating characteristics were tested to compare scores. Results The median values of all studied scores were significantly high among patients who needed MV and/or ICU admission. The AUC of SCS was >0.9, with a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 90.9% for the prediction of ICU admission. Meanwhile, MEWS was an excellent predictor of the need for MV (AUC = 0.996, 95% CI = 0.983-1.000). Conclusions We recommend using SCS as an early predictor for ICU admission in acute theophylline-poisoned patients. However, MEWS could effectively predict MV requirements in acute theophylline-poisoned patients.
更新日期:2023-10-03
down
wechat
bug