This review provides an overview and update of empirical evidence for psychologically meaningful dynamic risk factors and protective factors for sexual offending. Using the review by Mann et al. (2010) as a starting point, we reviewed relevant literature that has appeared since this publication, focusing on meta-analyses, systematic and scoping reviews of dynamic risk factors, recent evaluations of commonly used dynamic assessment tools, and studies of dynamic risk and protective factors in community samples in addition to clinical or forensic samples. Two risk factors previously deemed promising by Mann et al. (2010), hostility towards women and dysfunctional coping (conceptualized as hostile masculinity and emotional regulation deficits, respectively, in this review), could now be considered supported using this review's criteria of three or more studies demonstrating an effect size of 0.15 or greater. No new risk factors were identified. We conducted a broader search of protective factors in recognition of the relative newness of this literature: Positive social support was the only protective factor identified as empirically supported. We also discuss situational risk and protective factors.

本综述对性犯罪具有心理意义的动态风险因素和保护因素的经验证据进行了概述和更新。使用 Mann 等人的评论。（2010）作为起点，我们回顾了自本文出版以来出现的相关文献，重点是荟萃分析、动态风险因素的系统和范围审查、常用动态评估工具的最新评估以及动态风险和保护性研究除了临床或法医样本之外，社区样本中的因素。Mann 等人先前认为有希望的两个风险因素。(2010)，对女性的敌意和功能失调（在本综述中分别概念化为敌对的男性气质和情绪调节缺陷），现在可以使用本综述的三项或更多研究证明效应大小为 0.15 或更大的标准来考虑支持。没有发现新的风险因素。考虑到该文献的相对新颖性，我们对保护因素进行了更广泛的搜索：积极的社会支持是唯一被确定为得到经验支持的保护因素。我们还讨论了情境风险和保护因素。