Academic resilience describes the capability to bounce back from adverse circumstances and maintain positive psychological and academic well-being in school. Several prior studies have identified different risk factors that may cause academic setbacks, as well as protective factors that may mitigate the effects of such risk factors and promote academic resilience. Although academic resilience studies have increasingly reported the correlations between these various risk factors, protective factors, and measures of academic achievement, no published review has previously summarized the relative strength of these relationships. This meta-analysis of correlational evidence identified major risk and protective factors reported in the extant academic resilience literature. It also estimated the magnitude and direction of their relationships with academic achievement outcomes. A total of 56 studies and 239 effect sizes were included in the review. The aggregated correlations of relationships between risk, protective factors and achievement outcomes were small but statistically significant. The aggregated correlations of risk and protective factors and academic achievement were = −0.16 and = 0.16, respectively. The correlations between achievement and specific family, individual, and societal-related risk factors were significant and higher than the aggregate. Similarly, the correlations of achievement and specific ability, belief, and institutional protective factor variables were statistically significant. Implications of these relationships for future academic resilience studies are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

学术复原力研究中风险因素、保护因素和成就结果之间的关系：荟萃分析综述

学业韧性描述了从不利环境中恢复过来并在学校保持积极的心理和学业健康的能力。先前的几项研究已经确定了可能导致学业挫折的不同风险因素，以及可以减轻此类风险因素影响并提高学业弹性的保护因素。尽管学术弹性研究越来越多地报道了这些不同的风险因素、保护因素和学术成就衡量标准之间的相关性，但之前没有发表的评论总结了这些关系的相对强度。这项对相关证据的荟萃分析确定了现有学术弹性文献中报告的主要风险和保护因素。它还评估了他们与学业成绩的关系的程度和方向。该评价共纳入 56 项研究和 239 项效应量。风险、保护因素和成就结果之间关系的总体相关性很小，但具有统计学意义。风险和保护因素与学业成绩的总体相关性分别为 = −0.16 和 = 0.16。成就与特定家庭、个人和社会相关风险因素之间的相关性显着且高于总体相关性。同样，成就与具体能力、信念和制度保护因素变量的相关性具有统计显着性。讨论了这些关系对未来学术弹性研究的影响。