In 2018, the Leadership Quarterly commissioned a Special Issue (SI) on replications of previously published studies in leadership. We adopted the Registered Reports path for this special issue to facilitate constructive reviewer feedback prior to data collection and to minimize any bias against non-significant findings in the publishing process. In this editorial, we reflect on how this approach worked, what we learned about replications, and identify three myths that we have seen throughout this process regarding the value and conduct of replications. We then offer actionable solutions to further advance replications in science. We close with a discussion of the six studies included in this SI and the implications of these studies for leadership science. We hope that this work continues to inspire replications and registered reports and in support The Leadership Quarterly offers an open call for such submissions.

2018年，《领导力季刊》委托出版了一份特刊（SI），复制先前发表的领导力研究。我们针对本期特刊采用了注册报告路径，以便在数据收集之前促进审阅者提供建设性反馈，并最大限度地减少发布过程中对非重大发现的任何偏见。在这篇社论中，我们反思了这种方法是如何运作的，我们对复制的了解，并确定了我们在整个过程中看到的关于复制的价值和行为的三个神话。然后，我们提供可行的解决方案，以进一步推进科学复制。我们最后讨论了本 SI 中包含的六项研究以及这些研究对领导力科学的影响。我们希望这项工作继续激发复制和注册报告并支持《领导力季刊》公开征集此类意见书。