This study focuses on the relationship between the type of urban development and street vitality. It empirically analyzes how Land Readjustment (LR) and Housing Site Development (HSD) have generated different outcomes in the pedestrian volume in Seoul. LR is one of the most common urban development techniques in the world, and HSD has been predominant in developing new urban areas in South Korea since the 1980s. The results of an empirical analysis with 9588 pedestrian volume survey sites revealed that the LR areas had smaller blocks and lots, like those advocated by Jacobs (1961), and greater pedestrian volume compared to the sites developed by HSD that has created modernism built environments. Findings illustrate that LR has not only produced the desired design, density, and diversity for pedestrian volume but also possibly contributed to promoting street vitality. The development type for sites should be considered an important factor that will create urban tissues and vitality in the future.

本研究重点关注城市发展类型与街道活力之间的关系。它根据经验分析了土地重新调整 (LR) 和住宅用地开发 (HSD) 如何在首尔的行人流量中产生不同的结果。LR 是世界上最常见的城市开发技术之一，HSD 自 1980 年代以来一直在韩国开发新城市区域中占主导地位。对 9588 个行人流量调查站点进行实证分析的结果表明，与创造现代主义建筑环境的 HSD 开发的站点相比，LR 区域的街区和地块较小，如 Jacobs (1961) 所倡导的那样，并且行人流量更大。调查结果表明，LR 不仅产生了所需的设计、密度、和行人流量的多样性，但也可能有助于促进街道活力。场地的开发类型应被视为未来塑造城市组织和活力的重要因素。