当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Status of Early-Career Academic Cardiology
Journal of the American College of Cardiology ( IF 21.7 ) Pub Date : 2017-10-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.030
Carl W Tong 1 , Meena S Madhur 2 , Anne K Rzeszut 3 , Marwah Abdalla 4 , Islam Abudayyeh 5 , Erick Alexanderson 6 , Jonathan Buber 7 , Dmitriy N Feldman 8 , Rakesh Gopinathannair 9 , Ravi S Hira 10 , Andrew M Kates 11 , Thorsten Kessler 12 , Steve Leung 13 , Satish R Raj 14 , Erica S Spatz 15 , Melanie B Turner 16 , Anne Marie Valente 17 , Kristin West 18 , Chittur A Sivaram 19 , Joseph A Hill 20 , Douglas L Mann 21 , Andrew M Freeman 22
Affiliation  

Early-career academic cardiologists, who many believe are an important component of the future of cardiovascular care, face myriad challenges. The Early Career Section Academic Working Group of the American College of Cardiology, with senior leadership support, assessed the progress of this cohort from 2013 to 2016 with a global perspective. Data consisted of accessing National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute public information, data from the American Heart Association and international organizations, and a membership-wide survey. Although the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute increased funding of career development grants, only a small number of early-career American College of Cardiology members have benefited as funding of the entire cohort has decreased. Personal motivation, institutional support, and collaborators continued to be positive influential factors. Surprisingly, mentoring ceased to correlate positively with obtaining external grants. The totality of findings suggests that the status of early-career academic cardiologists remains challenging; therefore, the authors recommend a set of attainable solutions.

中文翻译:


早期职业心脏病学学术现状



许多人认为,职业生涯早期的学术心脏病专家是未来心血管护理的重要组成部分,但他们面临着无数的挑战。美国心脏病学会早期职业科学术工作组在高层领导的支持下,以全球视角评估了该群体2013年至2016年的进展。数据包括访问国家心肺血液研究所的公共信息、美国心脏协会和国际组织的数据以及会员范围内的调查。尽管国家心肺血液研究所增加了职业发展补助金,但由于整个队列的资金减少,只有少数早期职业生涯的美国心脏病学会成员受益。个人动机、机构支持和合作者仍然是积极的影响因素。令人惊讶的是,指导不再与获得外部资助呈正相关。总体研究结果表明,早期职业学术心脏病专家的地位仍然充满挑战。因此,作者推荐了一套可行的解决方案。
更新日期:2017-10-01
down
wechat
bug