The dynamic capability view (DCV) of the firm has become one of the leading frameworks aimed at identifying drivers of long-term firm survival and growth. Yet, despite considerable academic interest, there are many questions about what dynamic capabilities (DCs) are, how they relate to other organizational operations, and how they relate to firm performance. In this article, we provide a unique and comprehensive examination of the DCV literature that goes beyond past reviews by combining text-based analysis with surveys of, and interviews with, researchers in the field. With this approach, we are able to examine the evolution of the DCV in written literature and identify missing research themes. Based on this review, we argue that future research will benefit from integrating the DCV with configuration theory and the recent micro foundational thinking. We encapsulate this discussion via an architectural model of the DCV (entitled “House of Dynamic Capabilities”) that combines micro foundations underlying DCs at the varying levels of analysis (individual, business unit, and organizational) while also accounting for important enablers of DCs and firm strategic orientation. We also show how this logic requires a completely different set of methodological approaches to those currently in use.

公司的动态能力视图（DCV）已成为旨在确定公司长期生存和增长动力的主要框架之一。然而，尽管学术兴趣浓厚，但关于什么是动态能力（DC），它们如何与其他组织运营相关以及它们与公司绩效如何相关存在许多问题。在本文中，我们通过结合基于文本的分析与对该领域研究人员的调查和访谈，提供了DCV文献的独特而全面的检查，其内容超出了以往的评论范围。通过这种方法，我们能够检查书面文献中DCV的演变，并确定缺少的研究主题。根据此评论，我们认为，未来的研究将受益于将DCV与配置理论和最新的微观基础思想相结合。我们通过DCV的体系结构模型（称为“动态能力之家”）封装了此讨论，该模型结合了DC在不同分析级别（个人，业务部门和组织）的基础基础，同时也考虑了DC和坚定的战略定位。我们还将展示这种逻辑如何与目前使用的逻辑方法需要一套完全不同的方法论方法。和组织），同时也考虑了DC和企业战略定位的重要推动力。我们还将展示这种逻辑如何与目前使用的逻辑方法需要一套完全不同的方法论方法。和组织），同时也考虑了DC和企业战略定位的重要推动力。我们还将展示这种逻辑如何与目前使用的逻辑方法需要一套完全不同的方法论方法。