Association Between Sponsorship and Findings of Medical Home Evaluations,JAMA Internal Medicine

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › JAMA Intern. Med. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Association Between Sponsorship and Findings of Medical Home Evaluations
JAMA Internal Medicine ( IF 22.5 ) Pub Date : 2017-09-01 , DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3188
Anna Oh ₁ , Grant R. Martsolf ₂ , Mark W. Friedberg ₃

Affiliation

Association Between Sponsorship and Findings of Medical Home Evaluations Published evaluations of medical home interventions have reported mixed results.1,2 Some evaluators have been employed or funded by the sponsors of the interventions that they evaluated, while others were independent. Relationships between evaluators and sponsors of medical home interventions might influence evaluation designs and decisions about whether to publish evaluation findings.3,4 If such influence exists, evaluators employed or funded by intervention sponsors might be more likely to publish favorable findings (or suppress unfavorable findings), compared with evaluators who are independent—thus potentially biasing the medical home literature toward favorable effect estimates.

中文翻译：

赞助与医疗之家评估结果之间的关联

赞助与医疗之家评估结果之间的关联已发表的医疗之家干预措施的评估结果喜忧参半。1,2 一些评估员已被他们评估的干预措施的赞助商雇用或资助，而其他人则是独立的。评估者和医疗之家干预的发起人之间的关系可能会影响评估设计和关于是否发布评估结果的决定。 3,4 如果存在这种影响，干预发起人雇用或资助的评估者可能更有可能发布有利的结果（或压制不利的结果） )，与独立的评估者相比——因此可能会使医学家庭文献偏向于有利的效果估计。

更新日期：2017-09-01

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊最新论文本刊介绍/投稿指南11