当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Neurosci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort
Annual Review of Neuroscience ( IF 12.1 ) Pub Date : 2017-08-03 00:00:00 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526
Amitai Shenhav 1, 2 , Sebastian Musslick 3 , Falk Lieder 4 , Wouter Kool 5 , Thomas L. Griffiths 6 , Jonathan D. Cohen 3, 7 , Matthew M. Botvinick 8, 9
Affiliation  

In spite of its familiar phenomenology, the mechanistic basis for mental effort remains poorly understood. Although most researchers agree that mental effort is aversive and stems from limitations in our capacity to exercise cognitive control, it is unclear what gives rise to those limitations and why they result in an experience of control as costly. The presence of these control costs also raises further questions regarding how best to allocate mental effort to minimize those costs and maximize the attendant benefits. This review explores recent advances in computational modeling and empirical research aimed at addressing these questions at the level of psychological process and neural mechanism, examining both the limitations to mental effort exertion and how we manage those limited cognitive resources. We conclude by identifying remaining challenges for theoretical accounts of mental effort as well as possible applications of the available findings to understanding the causes of and potential solutions for apparent failures to exert the mental effort required of us.

中文翻译:


对精神努力的理性和机械解释

尽管有熟悉的现象学,但对精神努力的机制基础仍知之甚少。尽管大多数研究人员都认为精神上的努力是令人反感的,并且源于我们行使认知控制能力的局限性,但尚不清楚是什么导致了这些局限性,以及为什么它们会导致昂贵的控制体验。这些控制成本的存在还引发了关于如何最好地分配精神努力以最小化那些成本和最大化附带利益的进一步的问题。这篇综述探索了计算建模和实证研究的最新进展,旨在在心理过程和神经机制的层面上解决这些问题,同时检查了脑力劳动的局限性以及我们如何管理这些有限的认知资源。

更新日期:2017-08-03
down
wechat
bug