Frailty, a syndrome characterized by an exaggerated decline in function and reserve of multiple physiological systems, is common in older patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with worse clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Although several detailed assessment tools have been developed and validated in the geriatric population, they are cumbersome, not validated in patients with HF, and not commonly used in routine management of patients with HF. More recently, there has been an increasing interest in developing simple frailty screening tools that could efficiently and quickly identify frail patients with HF in routine clinical settings. As the burden and recognition of frailty in older patients with HF increase, a more comprehensive approach to management is needed that targets deficits across multiple domains, including physical function and medical, cognitive, and social domains. Such a multidomain approach is critical to address the unique, multidimensional challenges to the care of these high-risk patients and to improve their functional status, quality of life, and long-term clinical outcomes. This review discusses the burden of frailty, the conceptual underpinnings of frailty in older patients with HF, and potential strategies for the assessment, screening, and management of frailty in this vulnerable patient population.

Objectives This study sought to assess the effect of MRA treatment (vs. placebo) in older patients (≥75 years of age) compared with younger patients (<75 years of age) with heart failure (HF). Background Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and in a subset of patients with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). Notwithstanding, MRAs are underused, especially in the elderly. Pooling the individual patient data (IPD) provided more statistical power with which to assess the efficacy and safety of MRA treatment in this subpopulation. Methods An IPD meta-analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by trial. A total of 1,756 patients (853 randomized to placebo and 903 to MRA) ≥75 years of age, along with 4,411 patients (2,242 randomized to placebo and 2,169 to MRA) <75 years of age were included. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for HF. Results The treatment groups were well balanced. Patients ≥75 years of age or older and those 80 years of age, 61% were male, 30% had diabetes, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate 59 ml/min. The primary outcome occurred in 331 patients (38.8%) in the placebo group versus 281 (31.1%) in the MRA group (hazard ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.63 to 0.86; p < 0.001; and the heterogeneity p value [heterogeneity p = Cochran's Q p value of treatment effect by study interaction] was 0.52). Cardiovascular death and all-cause death were also reduced by MRAs without significant between-trial or age (younger vs. older) heterogeneity. Worsening renal function and hyperkalemia occurred more frequently in patients taking MRAs (vs. placebo). Compared to younger patients, worsening renal function (but not hyperkalemia) was found more frequently in the elderly. Conclusions MRAs reduced morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with HF, a beneficial effect that is more marked in patients with HFrEF but homogenous across HFrEF and HFpEF. Implementation of measures that increase MRA treatment in this population are warranted.

Objectives The authors examined efficacy and safety of spironolactone by age in the Americas region (N = 1,767) of the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial. Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction disproportionately affects older adults who may exhibit changes in physiology and variable pharmacokinetics. Methods TOPCAT enrolled patients with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45% who were age 50 or older with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and prior heart failure hospitalization or elevated natriuretic peptide levels. Participants were randomized to spironolactone or placebo with a mean follow-up duration of 3.3 years. We assessed treatment effect and safety by protocol-defined age categories (<65, 65 to 74, and ≥75 years). Results The mean age was 72 ± 10 years (range 50 to 97 years) with 41% over the age of 75 years. Participants ≥75 years were more commonly women and white and had a lower body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate compared with the younger age categories. Spironolactone reduced the primary composite outcome compared with placebo across all age categories (p interaction = 0.42). However, spironolactone was associated with an increased risk of the safety endpoint (hazard ratio: 2.54; 95% confidence interval: 1.91 to 3.37; p < 0.001), particularly in older age groups (p interaction = 0.02). Findings in the whole TOPCAT cohort were consistent with results from the Americas region. Conclusions In this post hoc, exploratory analysis of the TOPCAT trial data from the Americas region, although there was no effect of age on efficacy, there were considerable effects of age on increased rates of adverse safety outcomes. These results should be weighed when considering spironolactone for older heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients. (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist [TOPCAT]; NCT00094302)

Objectives This study assessed the potential role of differential diuretic drugs in preventing incident acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) study. Background SPRINT showed that intensive blood pressure reduction in older patients (50 to 97 years of age) resulted in 36% fewer incident cases of ADHF. However, some investigators have questioned whether this was due merely to intergroup differences in diuretic medications. Methods Detailed use of medication data prospectively collected throughout the trial were examined. Results ADHF events occurred in 173 of 9,361 participants. Diuretic medication increased in both arms from screening to baseline visit (from 45% to 50% in the standard arm; and from 43% to 63% in the intensive arm) and then remained steady. The lowest use of diuretic agents was among participants in the standard arm who never had an ADHF event. Withdrawal of diuretic agents at the baseline visit occurred in 6.1% (n = 284) of participants in the standard arm and 2.3% (n = 107) of participants in the intensive arm. Of these, only 11 developed ADHF during the trial (10 in the standard arm, 1 in the intensive arm), and only 1 occurred ≤1 month after diuretic withdrawal. The benefit of ADHF reduction remained significant even after excluding those 11 participants (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5 to 0.94; p = 0.02). Most ADHF events occurred in participants who were taking prescribed diuretic therapy at the last visit, prior to the ADHF event. There was limited use of loop (<6%) and potassium-sparing diuretic agents (2%). Diuretic use was not a predictor of ADHF (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.40; p = 0.83). Conclusions No evidence was found to suggest that the reduction in new ADHF events in SPRINT was due to differential diuretic use. (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial [SPRINT]; NCT01206062).

Objectives This study sought to characterize cognitive decline (CD) over time and its predictors in patients with systolic heart failure (HF). Background Despite the high prevalence of CD and its impact on mortality, predictors of CD in HF have not been established. Methods This study investigated CD in the WARCEF (Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial, which performed yearly Mini-Mental State Examinations (MMSE) (higher scores indicate better cognitive function; e.g., normal score: 24 or higher). A longitudinal time-varying analysis was performed among pertinent covariates, including baseline MMSE and MMSE scores during follow-up, analyzed both as a continuous variable and a 2-point decrease. To account for a loss to follow-up, data at the baseline and at the 12-month visit were analyzed separately (sensitivity analysis). Results A total of 1,846 patients were included. In linear regression, MMSE decrease was independently associated with higher baseline MMSE score (p < 0.0001), older age (p < 0.0001), nonwhite race/ethnicity (p < 0.0001), and lower education (p < 0.0001). In logistic regression, CD was independently associated with higher baseline MMSE scores (odds ratio [OR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 1.20]; p < 0.001), older age (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.50; p < 0.001), nonwhite race/ethnicity (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.72 to 3.13 for black; OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.69 for Hispanic vs. white; p < 0.001), lower education (p < 0.001), and New York Heart Association functional class II or higher (p = 0.03). Warfarin and other medications were not associated with CD. Similar trends were seen in the sensitivity analysis (n = 1,439). Conclusions CD in HF is predicted by baseline cognitive status, demographic variables, and NYHA functional class. The possibility of intervening on some of its predictors suggests the need for the frequent assessment of cognitive function in patients with HF. (Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction [WARCEF]; NCT00041938)

Objectives This study sought to determine whether age modifies the impact of key comorbidities on clinical outcomes for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Background Comorbidities impact outcomes in HFrEF. However, the effect of age on the impact of comorbidities on prognosis is not clearly understood. Methods Cox proportional hazards models were used assessed interactions between age and comorbidities on the primary composite endpoint (all-cause mortality or hospitalization) and secondary endpoints in the HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training) multicenter trial of 2,331 patients with HFrEF. Results Age did not significantly modify the effect of any comorbidity on the primary endpoint. However, age significantly modified the effect of body mass index (BMI) on all-cause mortality (interaction p = 0.02). Among patients ≥70 years of age, there was a U-shaped relationship between BMI and 1-year mortality, where BMI of 20 kg/m2 corresponded to 17.6%; a BMI of 30 kg/m2 corresponded to 7.0%; and a BMI of 40 kg/m2 corresponded to 11%. For patients <60 years of age, mortality increased nonsignificantly from 3.2% to 3.7% with increasing BMI. Age also modified the effect of depressive symptoms on all-cause mortality (interaction p = 0.03). Among patients ≥70 years of age, a 1-year mortality rate significantly increased from 7.8% for a Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score of 5% to 15.6% for BDI of 20. For patients <60 years of age, mortality was nonsignificantly related to BDI. Cumulative comorbidity scores were stronger predictors than age for mortality/hospitalization. Conclusions In chronic HFrEF, age markedly altered the impact of BMI and depressive symptoms on all-cause mortality, with much higher risk in older patients, but was not as strong a predictor of mortality/hospitalizations as cumulative comorbidity score. (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training [HF-ACTION]; NCT00047437)

Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in older adults (>75 years of age). Background An aging heart failure population together with improvements in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) technology have led to increasing LVAD implantations in older adults. However, data presenting age-specific outcomes are limited. Methods Adult patients in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) who required durable MCS between 2008 and 2017 were included. Patients were stratified by 4 age groups: <55 years of age, 55 to 64 years of age, and >75 years of age. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to assess post-LVAD outcomes, with log-rank testing used to compare groups. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine predictors of survival and complications. Results A total of 20,939 individuals received an LVAD during the study period: 7,743 (37.0%) were <55 years of age, 6,755 (32.3%) were 55 to 64 years of age, 5,418 (25.9%) were 65 to 74 years of age, and 1,023 (4.9%) were ≥75 years of age or older. After multivariate adjustment, adults ≥75 years of age had increased mortality post-LVAD implantation. Elderly patients with LVADs had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding but lower rates of device thrombosis. Compared to 84.5% of patients <55 years of age who were discharged home, only 46.8% of adults ≥75 years of age were discharged home following implantation (p < 0.001). Use of a RVAD, serum albumin level, and 6-min walk test distances were identified as predictors of outcomes in the oldest cohort. Conclusions Despite careful selection of older adults for LVAD implantation, age remains a significant predictor of mortality. Higher bleeding and lower clotting risk in elderly patients with LVADs support the use of a less intense antithrombotic regimen in this unique population.

Objectives This study sought to assess the prevalence of frailty, its associations with physical function, quality of life (QoL), cognition, and depression and to investigate more efficient methods of detection in older patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Background In contrast to the outpatient population with chronic HF, much less is known regarding frailty in older, hospitalized patients with ADHF. Methods Older hospitalized patients (N = 202) with ADHF underwent assessment of frailty (using Fried criteria), short physical performance battery (SPPB), 6-min walk test (6-MWT) distance, quality of life (QoL using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire), cognition (using the Montreal Cognition Assessment), and depression (using the Geriatric Depression Screen [GDS]). The associations of frailty with these patient-centered outcomes were assessed by using adjusted linear regression models. Novel strategies to identify frailty were examined. Results A total of 50% of older, hospitalized patients with ADHF were frail, 48% were pre-frail, and 2% were non-frail. Female sex, burden of comorbidity, and prior HF hospitalization were significantly associated with higher likelihood of frailty. Frailty (vs. pre-frail status) was associated with a significantly worse SPPB score (5 ± 2.2 vs. 7 ± 2.4, respectively), 6-MWT distance (143 ± 79 m vs. 221 ± 99 m, respectively), QoL (35 ± 19 vs. 46 ± 21, respectively), and more depression (GDS score: 5.5 ± 3.5 vs. 4.2 ± 3.3, respectively) but similar cognition. These associations were unchanged after adjustment for age, sex, race, total comorbidities, and body mass index. Slow gait speed plus low physical activity signaled frailty status as well (C-statistic = 0.85). Conclusions Ninety-eight percent of older, hospitalized patients with ADHF are frail or pre-frail. Frailty (vs. pre-frail status) is associated with worse physical function, QoL, comorbidity, and depression. The simple 4-m walk test combined with self-reported physical activity may quickly and efficiently identify frailty in older patients with ADHF.