We welcome Golsteyn, Heckman, and Humphries (this issue) comment regarding the roles of personality and intelligence for in predicting important life outcomes. In an earlier paper, Borghans, Golsteyn, Heckman, and Humphries (2016) argued that personality variables were stronger predictors of life outcomes than intelligence. In a rejoinder, Zisman and Ganzach (2022) analyzed some of the same data sets, and others, and came to the opposite conclusion. In their response in this issue, three of the authors of the original paper suggested that the disagreement stems from an inappropriate reliance on grades and achievement tests, and in particular the AFQT, as measures of intelligence. In the current comment we discuss the appropriateness of these measures, review the sources of the disagreement, and emphasize that Ganzach and Zisman's conclusion that intelligence is more important than personality in predicting life outcomes does not depend on this disagreement.

我们欢迎 Golsteyn、Heckman 和 Humphries（本期）就人格和智力在预测重要生活结果中的作用发表评论。在较早的一篇论文中，Borghans、Golsteyn、Heckman 和 Humphries (2016) 认为人格变量比智力更能预测生活结果。在反驳中，Zisman 和 Ganzach（2022）分析了一些相同的数据集和其他数据集，得出了相反的结论。在对这个问题的回应中，原论文的三位作者表示，分歧源于对成绩和成就测试，特别是 AFQT 作为智力衡量标准的不恰当依赖。在当前的评论中，我们讨论了这些措施的适当性，审查了分歧的根源，并强调 Ganzach 和 Zisman'