InTrump v. VanceandTrump v. Mazars, the Supreme Court applied very different standards for subpoenas issued for the personal papers of the president, making it easier for a grand jury to acquire such materials than a congressional committee. The two opinions, both authored by Chief Justice Roberts, have been widely praised for suggesting that the president is not wholly above the law; indeed, they have been treated as the second coming of theNixon Tapes Case.

中文翻译：

---

尼克松/特朗普：司法强化战略

在特朗普诉万斯案和特朗普诉玛泽斯案中，最高法院对针对总统个人文件发出的传票采用了截然不同的标准，这使得大陪审团比国会委员会更容易获得此类材料。这两份意见均由首席大法官罗伯茨撰写，因暗示总统并非完全凌驾于法律之上而广受赞誉；的确，它们被视为尼克松磁带案的第二次降临。