Prettyman argues that global attention to an identity crowded display entails attention to the individual items, and that in virtue of seeing the entire display, a global object, one sees the crowded items. This is a novel objection to Block's use of identity crowding as a counterexample to the necessity of attention for conscious object seeing. However, attending the whole display does not entail attending each individual (pace Prettyman). Thus, any defense of the conclusion that attention is necessary for seeing objects depends on the claim that each individual crowded item is not seen. I argue that Prettyman also fails to show that individual identity crowded items are seen, and that consequently, her argument, as it stands, does not alter the debate.

中文翻译：

---

看到和关注整体和部分：对Prettyman的回复

Prettyman 认为，对身份拥挤的展示的全局关注需要关注单个项目，并且由于看到整个展示，一个全局对象，人们看到了拥挤的项目。这是对 Block 使用身份拥挤作为对有意识的对象看到的注意必要性的反例的新颖反对意见。然而，参加整个显示器并不意味着参加每一个人（的步伐Prettyman）。因此，对看到物体需要注意的结论的任何辩护都取决于每个单独的拥挤物品都没有被看到的主张。我认为，Prettyman 也没有表明可以看到个人身份拥挤的物品，因此，就目前而言，她的论点并没有改变辩论。