当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Cyst. Fibros. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Clinimetric evaluation of muscle function tests for individuals with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis ( IF 5.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.05.014
Yann Combret 1 , Clement Medrinal 2 , Tristan Bonnevie 3 , Francis-Edouard Gravier 3 , Pascal Le Roux 4 , Bouchra Lamia 5 , Guillaume Prieur 6 , Gregory Reychler 7
Affiliation  

Accurate testing of muscle function is essential in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PEDro, ScienceDirect and Web of Science according to PRISMA and COSMIN guidelines from inception to September 2019 to investigate the clinimetric properties of muscle tests in individuals with CF. The search identified 37 studies (1310 individuals) and 34 different muscle tests. Maximal inspiratory pressure, inspiratory work capacity and quadriceps strength measured by computerised dynamometry were identified as reliable tests of muscle function. The one-minute sit-to-stand test was found to have high reliability but its validity to measure quadriceps strength is unknown. The clinimetric properties of other routinely used tests have not been reported in people with CF. Very different measurement procedures were identified. Inspiratory muscle and quadriceps testing can be considered as reliable but high-quality studies evaluating tests of other muscles function (e.g. muscle endurance) are lacking.

中文翻译:

囊性纤维化患者肌肉功能测试的临床评价:系统评价

对于囊性纤维化 (CF) 患者,准确测试肌肉功能至关重要。根据 PRISMA 和 COSMIN 指南,从成立到 2019 年 9 月,在 MEDLINE、CENTRAL、CINAHL、PEDro、ScienceDirect 和 Web of Science 中进行了文献检索,以研究 CF 患者肌肉测试的临床特性。搜索确定了 37 项研究(1310 个人)和 34 种不同的肌肉测试。通过计算机测力法测量的最大吸气压力、吸气功和股四头肌力量被确定为肌肉功能的可靠测试。一分钟坐立试验被发现具有很高的可靠性,但其测量股四头肌力量的有效性尚不清楚。其他常规使用的测试的临床特性尚未在 CF 患者中报告。确定了非常不同的测量程序。吸气肌和股四头肌测试可以被认为是可靠的,但缺乏评估其他肌肉功能(例如肌肉耐力)测试的高质量研究。
更新日期:2020-11-01
down
wechat
bug