Elsevier

Catalysis Today

Volume 343, 1 March 2020, Pages 101-111
Catalysis Today

Effect of potassium promoter on phase transformation during H2 pretreatment of a Fe2O3 Fischer Tropsch synthesis catalyst precursor

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.01.054Get rights and content

Highlights

  • H2 reduction behaviors of Fe2O3 based catalysts are investigated by in situ XRD.

  • Potassium promoter notably inhibits the reduction from α-Fe2O3 to Fe3O4.

  • The formation of α-Fe crystallite is accelerated or unchanged during reduction.

  • Potassium effect on FTS performance of the Fe2O3 based catalysts is studied.

Abstract

Effect of potassium promoter on phase transformation during the isothermal and temperature programmed reduction of the α-Fe2O3 catalyst were systematically investigated by in situ XRD. The reduction pathway of Fe2O3 based catalysts follows the same sequence of α-Fe2O3 → Fe3O4 → α-Fe during the isothermal reduction, in contrast to that of α-Fe2O3 → Fe3O4 → FeO/ α-Fe→ α-Fe during the temperature programmed reduction. The potassium promoter notably inhibits the reduction from α-Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 due to the enhanced strength of Fe-O bonds, whereas it either accelerates or has no effect on the formation rate of α-Fe crystallites during reduction. The potassium promoter increases the CO conversion during FTS, while enhances C5+, olefins, CO2 selectivity, and decreases CH4 selectivity.

Introduction

Iron based catalyst is widely used in Fischer Tropsch synthesis (FTS) for the production of hydrocarbons from coal, biomass or natural gas derived syngas (CO/H2) [1,2]. However, these catalysts are usually activated in H2, CO or syngas before use to form α-Fe or various iron carbides depending on pretreatment gases [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. During FTS, even though the initial activity of H2 pretreated catalyst is lower than that of CO or syngas pretreated catalysts, H2 pretreated catalyst results in a relative stable or even increasing FTS activity with time on stream [[10], [11], [12], [13], [14]]. In terms of iron based catalyst stability, it is concurred that the transformation of α-Fe to various iron carbides coincides with the increase of FTS activity for the H2 pretreated catalysts [15,16], while the CO or syngas pretreated catalysts often deactivate with time on stream, with corresponding buildup of inactive carbon species on catalyst surface [[10], [11], [12], [13],17,18]. In addition, the oxidation of the iron carbides also correlates with the deactivation of the iron based catalysts [19,20].Therefore, the focus of this part of our in situ XRD work was on the iron phase transformation during the H2 reduction and its effect on the catalyst performance.

Typically, potassium promoter increases the catalyst surface basicity, promotes the CO dissociation and inhibits H2 dissociation, which can be used in iron based catalysts to increase their FTS activity and the selectivity to long chain hydrocarbon and olefins [[21], [22], [23], [24]]. However, potassium promoter is another key factor that can modify the activation behaviors and iron phase distribution of the working catalysts [25,26]. It is reported that the addition of potassium can favor the formation of FeCx nuclei on iron oxide surface, promote the carburization rate and carburization extent of iron based catalysts [25,27,28]. During FTS, a low amount of potassium is enough to promote the FTS activity and stability [29,30], due to the transformation of iron carbides to the inactive iron oxide is inhibited substantially by potassium promoter [26]. However, further increase of the potassium content tends to notably enhance the deactivation rate, coinciding with the conversion of χ-Fe5C2 to ε’-Fe2.2C and the formation of inactive carbon species surrounding the catalysts surface which prevent the contact of catalysts surface with the gaseous reactants [26,31]. Even though numerous studies on the effect of H2 pretreatment and potassium promoter on the FTS performance have been carried out, few were in situ studies on the effect of potassium during the dynamic phase transformation under hydrogen pretreatment [32,33].

In our previous study, the carburization behaviors of the un-promoted and potassium promoted Fe2O3 catalysts during pretreatment in 2% CO/He or 2% CO/8% H2/He at 270 °C were systematically investigated by in situ XRD. It was observed that the carburization followed a consecutive pathway of α-Fe2O3 → Fe3O4 → χ-Fe5C2 and/or θ-Fe3C [34]. Further details suggest that the carburization of α-Fe2O3 catalysts is a bidirectional process of oxygen removal against carbon diffusion in the iron oxide crystal lattice. In order to study the carburization process of the α-Fe2O3 catalysts, the carburization process is divided into two process: (1) the outward lattice oxygen removal which corresponding to the reduction of the α-Fe2O3 catalysts by H2; (2) the inward carbon diffusion which corresponding to the carburization of the α-Fe catalysts by CO.

This work presents an in situ XRD study to trace the reduction behaviors of α-Fe2O3 based catalysts by 10% H2/He at both isothermal reduction (270 °C) and temperature programmed reduction processes. In addition, the effect of potassium on the reduction behaviors of α-Fe2O3 catalysts was also investigated systematically. The relative abundance of individual crystallite was collected during the reduction process to illustrate the effect of potassium promoter on the reduction behaviors of α-Fe2O3 catalyst. Particular attention was paid to the influence of potassium on the reduction rate of α-Fe2O3 catalyst.

Section snippets

Catalyst preparation

The un-promoted and potassium promoted α-Fe2O3 catalysts used in this study were prepared by a combination of precipitation and spray-dried methods which could be found elsewhere [34]. In brief, corresponding amount of iron nitrate (III) solution and NH4OH solution were added simultaneously to a beaker to keep the pH around 9.0. The temperature was kept at 80°C during all the precipitation process. After the precipitation, the slurry was filtered and washed until the pH was about 7.0, then

Isothermal reduction of the catalysts in H2

The powder XRD patterns of the un-promoted and potassium promoted Fe2O3 catalysts used in this work have been reported in our previous study and the only detectable phase was hematite (PDF 87–1164) [34]. The reduction of un-promoted and potassium promoted Fe2O3 catalysts by H2 was studied here, aiming to separate the oxygen diffusion step from the carbon diffusion influence during the phase transformation and crystallite growth process of catalyst carburization. Meanwhile, the promotional

Conclusions

The H2 reduction behaviors of α-Fe2O3 catalyst were studied systematically by in situ XRD. Meanwhile, the promotional effect of potassium was also investigated. It is concluded that all the Fe2O3 based catalysts follow the same sequential reduction pathway of α-Fe2O3 → Fe3O4 → α-Fe during the reduction by 10% H2/He at 270 °C, except for a minute quantity of FeO crystallites observed at the end of the reduction for 100Fe2O3/1.54 K and 100Fe2O3/2.4 K.

In addition, all the Fe2O3 based catalysts

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the facilities and financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21473229, No. 91545121, and No. 21673273). We also acknowledge the innovation foundation of the Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Thousand Young Talents Program of China, Hundred-Talent Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Shanxi Hundred-Talent Program.

References (58)

  • J.W. Niemantsverdriet et al.

    On the time-dependent behavior of Iron catalysts in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

    J. Catal.

    (1981)
  • A.G. Sault et al.

    An auger electron spectroscopy study of the activation of Iron Fischer–Tropsch catalysts: II. Carbon monoxide activation

    J. Catal.

    (1993)
  • M.D. Shroff et al.

    Activation of precipitated iron Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts

    J. Catal.

    (1995)
  • C.H. Bartholomew et al.

    Effects of pretreatment, reaction, and promoter on microphase structure and Fischer–Tropsch activity of precipitated iron catalysts

  • W. Ning et al.

    Phase transformation of unpromoted and promoted Fe catalysts and the formation of carbonaceous compounds during Fischer–Tropsch synthesis reaction

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2006)
  • M.E. Dry et al.

    Correlation between catalyst surface basicity and hydrocarbon selectivity in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

    J. Catal.

    (1968)
  • M.E. Dry et al.

    Heats of chemisorption on promoted iron surfaces and role of alkali in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

    J. Catal.

    (1969)
  • D.B. Bukur et al.

    Role of water-gas-shift reaction in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis on iron catalysts: a review

    Catal. Today

    (2016)
  • S.Z. Li et al.

    Promoted iron-based catalysts for the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: design, synthesis, site densities, and catalytic properties

    J. Catal.

    (2002)
  • A.P. Raje et al.

    Effect of potassium promotion on iron-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • N. Lohitharn et al.

    Effect of K promotion of Fe and FeMn Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts: analysis at the site level using SSITKA

    J. Catal.

    (2008)
  • S. Janbroers et al.

    Insights into the nature of iron-based Fischer–Tropsch catalysts from quasi in situ TEM-EELS and XRD

    J. Catal.

    (2009)
  • Z.H. Chonco et al.

    Comparing silver and copper as promoters in Fe-based Fischer–Tropsch catalysts using delafossite as a model compound

    J. Catal.

    (2013)
  • W.K. Jozwiak et al.

    Reduction behavior of iron oxides in hydrogen and carbon monoxide atmospheres

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2007)
  • H. Wang et al.

    Hydrogen reduction kinetics modeling of a precipitated iron Fischer Tropsch catalyst

    J. Mol. Catal. A Chem.

    (2009)
  • D.C. Sorescu

    Adsorption and activation of CO coadsorbed with K on Fe(100) surface: a plane-wave DFT study

    Surf. Sci.

    (2011)
  • S. Vasudevan et al.

    XPES and UVPES studies of iron oxides

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (1979)
  • J. Zieliński et al.

    Reduction of Fe2O3 with hydrogen

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2010)
  • D.G. Rethwisch et al.

    Adsorptive and catalytic properties of supported metal oxides: III. Water-gas shift over supported iron and zinc oxides

    J. Catal.

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text