Elsevier

Biochimie

Volume 159, April 2019, Pages 3-8
Biochimie

Review
A cross-talk between fat and bitter taste modalities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2018.06.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Fat and bitter taste modalities are altered in obesity.

  • The two taste modalities might interact with each other to give rise “bitter fat taste”.

  • The interaction between bitter and fat taste might involve/share signaling mechanisms, downstream to receptor activation.

Abstract

The choice of food is governed largely by the sense of taste. To date, five basic taste modalities have been described; however, there is an increasing agreement on the existence of a 6th fat taste. The taste modalities might interact with each other and also with other senses. The advancements in cellular and molecular biology have helped the characterization of taste signaling mechanisms, down to the receptor level and beyond. CD36 and GPR120 have been shown to be involved in the detection of fat taste while bitter taste is perceived by a number of receptors that belong to a family of taste-type 2 receptors (T2R or TAS2R). Hence, the most common role is played by TAS2R16 and TAS2R38 in bitter taste perception in humans. Increasing evidences from behavioural studies suggest that fat and bitter taste modalities might interact with each other, and this interaction might be critical in obesity. In the current review, we will discuss the evidence from genetic and behavioural studies and propose the molecular mechanism of a cross-talk between fat and bitter tastes.

Introduction

Humans are omnivorous food-seeking species that have developed through evolution a sense of taste to survive in a complex environment. Taste is a sensory modality, involving the oral perception of food-derived chemicals that stimulate receptor cells within taste buds [1]. Taste not only helps decide whether a food is noxious or palatable but also prepares the gastrointestinal tract for post-ingestive metabolic events. The 5 basic taste modalities have been demonstrated. Simple carbohydrates are perceived as sweet, sodium salts and salts of few cations are perceived as salty, acids are perceived as sour while amino acids like glutamate and aspartate elicit a savoury taste [2]. Moreover, during the recent couple of years, there has been an increasing agreement that fatty acids might trigger a lipid taste [3]. Recent evidence indicates that CD36 and GPR120 might play a non-overlapping role in the detection of a fat taste [4].

The taste receptor (TR) cells are regrouped in taste buds which are the units of the papillae, distributed on the tongue. There are three kinds of papillae: fungiforme (localized in the frontal part of the tongue), foliate (localized in the lateral region of the tongue) and circumvallate (present on the anterior part of the tongue). There are three types of taste cells wherein type I cells are considered as supporting cells, type II cells respond to bitter, sweet and umami, and type III cells are involved in making synaptic junctions with afferent nerve fibres. In this review, we will not go into the details of perception of different taste modalities, as several recent review articles can be consulted on this subject [2,[5], [6], [7]]. Briefly, the heterodimeric T1R2/T1R3 detects the sweet taste whereas, the T1R1/T1R3 heterodimer is sensitive to umami taste [2]. Salt activates sodium channels, while the acidic compounds induce depolarization by blocking potassium channels [7]. TAS2R receptors have been shown to be involved in the perception of bitter taste. Bitter molecules belong to the largest family of tastants and humans possess more than 25 functional bitter taste receptor genes to interact with such large group of taste substances [1]. Therefore, most of the noxious and poisonous substances are experienced as bitter.

The majority of laboratory studies on taste perception are based on the use of candidate molecules. However, in the real world, food, most often, comprises of a mixture of agents that can trigger different taste sensations at the same time. The sense of taste can interact with other senses, and different taste modalities may interact with each other [8,9]. For instance, salt taste has been shown to inhibit bitterness in food and enhances flavour [10,11]. Similarly, salty and sour tastes have been shown to interact each other with the enhancement of their effect at low concentrations, while causing an inhibition or no effect at high concentrations [12]. It is interesting to mention that some amino acids like l-arginie or l-lysine may modulate the oro-sensory perception of 5 taste modalities. The exogenous l-Arg was found to increase the perception of sucrose, umami, sodium chloride, salt and bitterness of caffeine only in tasters, and to decrease citric acid sourness [13]. Indeed, l-arginine has been considered as “carrier” as its addition to bitter molecules increases the bitterness as this agent makes hydrogen-bonded adducts that increase the solubility of PROP and its interaction with the receptor [14]. A detailed understanding of various taste interactions is out of the scope of the current appraisal and can be found elsewhere [12]. We will focus on the cross-talk between bitter and fat taste for the remaining part of this review.

Section snippets

Evidence from behavioural studies

To assess the bitter taste perception, the investigators have employed different agonists/agents like PROP (6-n-propylthiouracial), PTC (phenylthiocarbamide), quinine, caffeine etc. that elicit an unpleasant taste sensation [15]. On the basis of sensitivity to one of the bitter compounds, the researchers have classified the subjects as taster, non-taster or super taster. As regards fat taste perception, the fatty acids like oleic acid or linoleic acid or sometimes oils like canola oil or fat

Possible cross-talk between fat and bitter taste

Whether TAS2R38 plays a role as sensor for textural clues or it also provides chemosensory signals and is involved in cross-talk between fat and bitter taste is yet to be determined. However, there are several reports that have shed light on the association between fat and bitter taste perception. Keller [47] suggested that TAS2R38 might be involved in the textural perception of dietary fat through its association with the PROP taster phenotype, whereas CD36 protein would influence chemosensory

Conclusions and perspectives

Our short, but comprehensive review, sheds light on the interaction of “bitter taste” and “bitter taste of lipids”. However, there is a long way to better understand this interaction. The recent report on the involvement of olfaction in the perception of “fat bitterness” has twisted the story. In future, a number of behavioural and genetic studies are required to confirm this relationship in different populations of the world as by now only one study is available on this subject [28]. Besides,

Conflict-of-interest disclosure statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

References (58)

  • S. Ebba et al.

    The examination of fatty acid taste with edible strips

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2012)
  • B.J. Tepper et al.

    Fat perception is related to PROP taster status

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1997)
  • I. Karmous et al.

    Orosensory detection of bitter in fat-taster healthy and obese participants: genetic polymorphism of CD36 and TAS2R38

    Clin. Nutr.

    (2018)
  • C.D. Dotson et al.

    Variation in the gene TAS2R38 is associated with the eating behavior disinhibition in Old Order Amish women

    Appetite

    (2010)
  • E. Adler et al.

    A novel family of mammalian taste receptors

    Cell

    (2000)
  • P. Shi et al.

    Adaptive diversification of bitter taste receptor genes in Mammalian evolution

    Mol. Biol. Evol.

    (2003)
  • S.D. Roper et al.

    Taste buds: cells, signals and synapses

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2017)
  • M.H. Ozdener et al.

    CD36- and GPR120-mediated Ca2+ signaling in human taste bud cells mediates differential responses to fatty acids and is altered in obese mice

    Gastroenterology

    (2014)
  • P. Besnard et al.

    Taste of fat: a sixth taste modality?

    Physiol. Rev.

    (2015)
  • J.A. Mennella et al.

    The development of sweet taste: from biology to hedonics

    Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord.

    (2016)
  • B. Murtaza et al.

    Alteration in taste perception in cancer: causes and strategies of treatment

    Front. Physiol.

    (2017)
  • B.N. Landis et al.

    Chemosensory interaction: acquired olfactory impairment is associated with decreased taste function

    J. Neurol.

    (2010)
  • R.S. Keast et al.

    A psychophysical investigation of binary bitter-compound interactions

    Chem. Senses

    (2003)
  • M. Remis et al.

    Taste responses to fructose and tannic acid among gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla)

    Int. J. Primatol.

    (2002)
  • M. Melis et al.

    Taste perception of sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami and changes due to l-arginine supplementation, as a function of genetic ability to taste 6-n-Propylthiouracil

    Nutrients

    (2017)
  • M. Melis et al.

    Dose-dependent effects of l-arginine on PROP bitterness intensity and latency and characteristics of the chemical interaction between PROP and l-arginine

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • K.L. Mueller et al.

    The receptors and coding logic for bitter taste

    Nature

    (2005)
  • K.L. Metcalf et al.

    Taste intensities of oil-in-water emulsions with varying fat content

    J. Sensory Stud.

    (2002)
  • D. Gaillard et al.

    The gustatory pathway is involved in CD36-mediated orosensory perception of long-chain fatty acids in the mouse

    Faseb. J.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Brown goat yogurt: Metabolomics, peptidomics, and sensory changes during production

      2023, Journal of Dairy Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, the fatty flavor in brown goat yogurt resulted in the upregulation of “Ca2+-signaling,” the common mechanism between the bitter, fatty, and sweet perceptions. Following activation of fatty receptors and inhibition of bitterness receptors, store-operated calcium channels opened, triggering inhibition of TRPM5 channels (Khan et al., 2019), which in brown goat yogurt suppressed the consumers perception of bitterness. The lower texture score of brown goat milk compared with brown goat yogurt may be due to the whey proteins aggregation caused by the free–SH group interacting with the S–S bond of cysteine-containing proteins, such as α-LA, β-LG, and κ-CN via –SH/S–S interchange reactions (Bavaro et al., 2019).

    • Bacillus amyloliquefaciens exopolysaccharide preparation induces glucagon-like peptide 1 secretion through the activation of bitter taste receptors

      2021, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, other studies using different cell models have demonstrated that the activation of T2R38 also prompts GLP-1 secretion from enteroendocrine cells [32,33]. Moreover, the polymorphisms of T2R38 have been associated with bitter taste sensitivity, food preferences, dietary behavior, metabolic control [34,35], and even human longevity [36] and COVID-19 mortality [37]. Thus, the ligands of T2R38 may regulate human health or even the human lifespan.

    • Recent advances in development of biosensors for taste-related analyses

      2020, TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is widely agreed that humans have five primary taste sensations: sour, sweet, bitter, salty and umami [2–4]. Recent studies suggested that fat could also be detected as the sixth basic taste (G-protein coupled receptors have been reported to be responsible for fat taste, however the fat taste is remains controversial, hence the fat taste will not be discussed in this review) [5–8]. Umami taste generally indicates the presence of protein or l-amino acids in food-stuffs [4], and carbohydrates provide energy and are associated with sweetness [2].

    • Preference for dietary fat: From detection to disease

      2020, Progress in Lipid Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      We have proposed that textural perception might be relayed by bitter taste signaling via T2R38, whereas the chemosensory perception would involve the activation of CD36. This cross-talk will involve an interaction, probably via the activation of TRMP5 channels, downstream to lingual lipid sensors at the level of second messenger cascade [65]. Barbarossa et al. [66] have suggested that olfactory stimulation might play a critical role in the perception of “bitter taste” of LCFAs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text