Journal of Molecular Biology
Volume 432, Issue 3, 7 February 2020, Pages 682-693
Journal home page for Journal of Molecular Biology

Review
TADs or no TADS: Lessons From Single-cell Imaging of Chromosome Architecture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.034Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Eukaryotic genomes are organized in a hierarchical multiscale fashion.

  • We focus on the contribution of novel imaging technologies to chromatin organization.

  • There is a high degree of stochasticity in genome folding in single cells.

  • TADs are functional units but not necessarily stable physical entities.

  • The stochastic nature of folding is likely essential to regulate chromatin transactions.

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes are folded in a hierarchical organization that reflects and possibly regulates their function. Genomewide studies revealed a new level of organization at the kilobase-to-megabase scale termed “topological associating domains” (TADs). TADs are characterized as stable units of chromosome organization that restrict the action of regulatory sequences within one “functional unit.” Consequently, TADs are expected to appear as physical entities in most cells. Very recent single-cell studies have shown a notable variability in genome architecture at this scale, raising concerns about this model. Furthermore, the direct and simultaneous observation of genome architecture and transcriptional output showed the lack of stable interactions between regulatory sequences in transcribing cells. These findings are consistent with a large body of evidence suggesting that genome organization is highly heterogeneous at different scales. In this review, we discuss the main strategies employed to image chromatin organization, present the latest state-of-the-art developments, and propose an interpretation reconciling population-based findings with direct single-cell chromatin organization observations. All in all, we propose that TADs are made of multiple, low-frequency, low-affinity interactions that increase the probability, but are not deterministic, of regulatory interactions.

Introduction

Storing large amounts of information in small spaces while being able to readily access it rapidly and efficiently remains a current technological challenge of man-made storage devices. Eukaryotic cells face a similar challenge as they need to pack around 2 m of linear DNA into a micrometer-sized nucleus. Yet, despite this remarkable degree of compaction, the information contained in the DNA sequence is replicated and translated in a very short amount of time and with great accuracy to ensure inheritance to daughter cells and continuous normal cellular functioning.

At the nucleus, the linear genome is organized in a hierarchical multiscale fashion ranging from a few kilobases to megabases that is, in most cases, reflected by the three-dimensional (3D) folding of chromatin (Fig. 1). Additionally, the minimal structure of chromatin, the nucleosome, represented by DNA wrapped around specific proteins (histones), can carry different covalent chemical modifications that will determine how DNA will interact with transcriptional and reparation machineries and thus chromatin state (for an extended review, see Ref. [1]). Compact and repressed chromatin (heterochromatin) domains are usually found at the nucleus periphery and segregated from active and large (eu-)chromatin domains [2] where chromatin is thought to be actively transcribed [3]. On a larger scale, it is now well accepted that individual chromosomes are organized into territories (CT) [4,5] and rarely intermingle with each other. However, the internal organization of chromosomes remained largely unknown until recently. Over the past decade, several breakthroughs in high-throughput sequencing enabled the mapping of pairwise interactions between genetic loci with genomic specificity and genomewide coverage [[6], [7], [8], [9]] unveiling novel hierarchical levels of eukaryotic chromatin organization. Topologically associated domains (TADs) have been defined as regions displaying enriched interactions with neighboring DNA and appear in Hi-C matrices as squares on the main diagonal [[10], [11], [12]]. Thus, the definition of TADs describes a novel feature of Hi-C maps and does not involve any specific factor (e.g., cohesin) or mechanism (e.g., loop extrusion) [13]. Finally, active/repressed TADs often associate with each other in the nucleus to form active (A) or inactive (B) compartments (Fig. 1) [6,[10], [11], [12],14,15].

Hierarchical organization critically impacts nuclear activities such as transcription, replication as well as cellular events such as cell-cycle regulation, key cell fate decisions, and embryonic development, yet the mechanisms and the exact role of each structural element, particularly at the TAD level, are still a matter of debate. Particularly, from genomewide methods, two contrasting hypotheses regarding the role of TADs and their structural interpretation have arisen (see next section). Fluorescent microscopy is in a privileged place to reveal the nuclear organization in single cells and settle this apparent contradiction. The aim of this review is to present an overview of microscopy findings over the last decade that lay the bases of present discoveries and the current state-of-the-art on high-throughput–high-content imaging technologies. We will put into context and discuss the results from these findings to present a general picture of genome organization and a new interpretation that reconciles both models.

Section snippets

Are TADs a stable structural unit of chromatin organization or a statistical phenomenon?

TADs range in size from tens of kilobases to megabases and are defined as self-interacting genomic regions: genomic loci within a TAD display a higher probability of interacting with loci belonging to the same TAD than with other genomic locations. TADs display remarkable correlations with coordinated gene expression [10,16], epigenetic histone modifications [10,12,17], and replication timing [10,18]. In addition, TADs exhibit a surprising developmental and evolutionary robustness [11,19,20].

What Imaging Technologies Have Revealed So Far About Chromatin Organization

The imaging strategies to study genome organization can be, according to the labeling approach, divided mainly in two: 1) the labeling of a nuclear protein associated to chromatin or 2) the labeling of specific DNA/RNA sequences. The first approach relies on inmunorecognition, usually of the endogenous protein, or marking the protein of interest with a fluorescent tag, which usually involves ectopic expression. This results in a labeling at the level of the whole nucleus. Particularly

Simultaneous Imaging of Tens of Genomic Regions in Single Cells at High Resolution

The combination of FISH and super-resolution microscopies shed light into the structural heterogeneity of chromatin folding into TADs and on the relative condensation levels of different TAD types. But, further structural insight requires the ability to visualize multiple genomic regions in the same cell at once. Early work introduced color barcoding in FISH to reveal the position of 13 genomic loci spaced across an entire Drosophila chromosome arm using spatial constraints [59]. More recently,

Chromatin Architecture and Transcriptional Status in Single Cells: Reinterpreting the Link Between Chromatin Folding and Gene Expression

An early study reported that single-cell RNA expression and TAD compaction were correlated [35]. Interestingly, volumes of TADs within inactive and active X-chromosomes were anticorrelated. In fact, expression of one of the genes within this TAD (Tsix) tended to be higher in the allele with the smaller TAD, whereas expression of a second gene within the same TAD (Linx) correlated instead with larger TAD volumes. This indicates that gene expression can impact in different manners the overall

Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Nuclear architecture is much more heterogeneous than originally anticipated from genomewide biochemical methods. A wealth of data from imaging and single-cell methods are therefore inconsistent with the existence of stable, deterministic 3D folding structures. In information science, noise is generally the enemy of information; however, a tolerable amount of noise is a source of freedom and warrants flexibility [92,93]. For instance, the ability of chromatin to explore a wide range of

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement No 724429) to M.N and from Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, Provincia de Córdoba (Res 79/18, 2018) to A.M.C.G. A.M.C.G. is a postdoctoral fellow of Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.

References (95)

  • Maria Aurelia Ricci et al.

    Chromatin fibers are formed by heterogeneous groups of nucleosomes in vivo

    Cell

    (2015)
  • Jianquan Xu et al.

    Super-resolution imaging of higher-order chromatin structures at different epigenomic states in single mammalian cells

    Cell Rep.

    (2018)
  • Frédéric Bantignies et al.

    Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant hox loci in Drosophila

    Cell

    (2011)
  • J.G.J. Bauman et al.

    A new method for fluorescence microscopical localization of specific DNA sequences by in Situ hybridization of fluorochrome-labelled RNA

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1980)
  • Geoffrey Fudenberg et al.

    Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion

    Cell Rep.

    (2016)
  • Denes Hnisz et al.

    A phase separation model for transcriptional control

    Cell

    (2017)
  • Kazuhiro Maeshima et al.

    Liquid-like behavior of chromatin

    Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.

    (2016)
  • Fabian Erdel et al.

    formation of chromatin subcompartments by phase separation

    Biophys. J.

    (2018)
  • Arjun Raj et al.

    Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences

    Cell

    (2008)
  • Naama Barkai et al.

    Variability and robustness in biomolecular systems

    Mol. Cell

    (2007)
  • Simona Patange et al.

    Single-cell systems biology: probing the basic unit of information flow

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (2018)
  • Sandy L. Klemm et al.

    Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome

    Nat. Rev. Genet.

    (2019)
  • J.H. Frenster et al.

    Repressed and active chromatin isolated from interphase lymphocytes

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A

    (1963)
  • H. Weintraub et al.

    Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation

    Science

    (1976)
  • Andreas Bolzer et al.

    Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes

    PLoS Biol.

    (2005)
  • T. Cremer et al.

    Chromosome territories

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology

    (2010)
  • J. Dekker et al.

    Capturing chromosome conformation

    Science

    (2002)
  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden et al.

    Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome

    Science

    (2009)
  • Elzo de Wit et al.

    A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization

    Genes Dev.

    (2012)
  • Jesse R. Dixon et al.

    Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions

    Nature

    (2012)
  • Elphège P. Nora et al.

    Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre

    Nature

    (2012)
  • Elnaz Alipour et al.

    Self-organization of domain structures by DNA-loop-extruding enzymes

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2012)
  • Erez Lieberman-Aiden et al.

    Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome

    Science

    (2009)
  • Anthony D. Schmitt et al.

    Genome-wide mapping and analysis of chromosome architecture

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2016)
  • Le Dily et al.

    Distinct structural transitions of chromatin topological domains correlate with coordinated hormone-induced gene regulation

    Genes Dev.

    (2014)
  • Benjamin D. Pope et al.

    Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation

    Nature

    (2014)
  • Jesse R. Dixon et al.

    Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation

    Nature

    (2015)
  • Yin Shen et al.

    A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome

    Nature

    (2012)
  • Orsolya Symmons et al.

    Functional and topological characteristics of mammalian regulatory domains

    Genome Res.

    (2014)
  • Yad Ghavi-Helm et al.

    Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase

    Nature

    (2014)
  • Daniel S. Neems et al.

    Topologically associated domains enriched for lineage-specific genes reveal expression-dependent nuclear topologies during myogenesis

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A

    (2016)
  • Gil Ron et al.

    Promoter-enhancer interactions identified from Hi-C data using probabilistic models and hierarchical topological domains

    Nat. Commun.

    (2017)
  • Clemens B. Hug et al.

    Chromatin architecture emerges during zygotic genome activation independent of transcription

    Cell

    (2017)
  • Takashi Nagano et al.

    Cell-cycle dynamics of chromosomal organization at single-cell resolution

    Nature

    (2017)
  • Tim J. Stevens et al.

    3D structures of individual mammalian genomes studied by single-cell Hi-C

    Nature

    (2017)
  • Ilya M. Flyamer et al.

    Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition

    Nature

    (2017)
  • Christian Lanctôt et al.

    Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions

    Nat. Rev. Genet.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Cell cycle dynamics and developmental dynamics of the 3D genome: toward linking the two timescales

      2022, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Igh locus TAD also undergoes a B-to-A compartment change upon activation of V(D)J recombination during B cell differentiation [49,50], which suggests that single TAD-level compartment changes might also be observed in other developmental contexts. Recently, a high-resolution microscopic analysis has revealed A/B compartment separation in single cells [51], while TADs revealed by population Hi-C were not always detected in individual cells [52]. If this is the case, it raises questions about the aforementioned single TAD-level compartment regulation model.

    • Chromatin as self-returning walks: From population to single cell and back

      2022, Biophysical Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of course, the findings presented herein are based on the assumption that interphase chromatin is best represented by α = 1.15. While our previous work has demonstrated that SRRW trajectories with α = 1.15 have excellent agreement with single-cell experimental analysis of the chromatin structure, it is still likely that α may vary between cells or cell lines (45–48). Indeed, the main limitation of our method is that, as our intention was to analyze how heterogeneities of single-cell chromatin could manifest in population-averaged maps unsupervised by Hi-C data, we currently are unable to compare our results against experimental Hi-C data.

    • FISH Going Meso-Scale: A Microscopic Search for Chromatin Domains

      2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text