Elsevier

Water Research

Volume 171, 15 March 2020, 115458
Water Research

Attachment and adhesion force between biogas bubbles and anaerobic granular sludge in the up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115458Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The interaction of AGS and biogas bubbles was studied for the first time.

  • The attachment and adhesion force of CH4 on AGSp were higher than that of AGSb.

  • The surface hydrophobicity and functional groups of AGS affected their interaction.

Abstract

The performance of the up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) is significantly governed by the hydrodynamics of the reactor. Though the influence of hydrodynamics on mass transfer, granular size distribution, and biogas production was well studied, the interaction between biogas bubbles and anaerobic granular sludge (AGS) is poorly understood. This study used the impinging-jet technique and bubble probe atomic force microscope (AFM) to investigate the attachment and adhesion force between biogas bubbles (CH4 and CO2) and AGS. The fluxes of normalized CH4 or CO2 bubble-attachment on two kinds of AGS were directly affected by gas velocity and decreased with an increase in the Reynolds number ranged from 40 to 140. The bubble-attachment had a positive linear relationship with the contact angles, ratio of exopolymeric protein and polysaccharide, and hydrophilic functional groups of AGS. A bubble probe AFM was used to explore the adhesion force between a single bubble and AGS. The results indicated that the adhesion force between the bubbles and the two kinds of AGS also decreased with increasing approach velocity. Overall, these results contribute to a new insight into the understanding of interaction between biogas bubbles and AGS in UASB reactors.

Introduction

Over the past decades, anaerobic digestion has been widely used in the management of wastes and wastewaters as it reduces organic pollutants and produces renewable energy (Nguyen and Khanal, 2018). Moreover, it has undergone significant improvement due to the use of bio-reactors that are based on granular sludge (Zhang et al., 2012). Among them, up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) is one of the most widely used high-rate anaerobic reactors for sewage treatment (Lettinga, 2001). The performance of a UASB is significantly influenced by the mixing of wastewater with anaerobic granular sludge (AGS), which is governed by the hydrodynamics of the reactor (Kundu et al., 2014). The characteristics of hydrodynamics in a UASB have been studied extensively under different conditions (Batstone et al., 2005; Peña et al., 2006; Ren et al., 2009). In previous papers, granular settlement in UASB was considered as Stokes flow, having a Reynolds number lower than 1 (Gupta and Gupta, 2005; Laguna et al., 1999). However, further research indicated that the Reynolds number of AGS in the typical UASB reactor fell in an intermediate flow regime category, with the Reynolds number between 1 and 500 (Tassew et al., 2019). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with Eulerian-Eulerian model has often been used to characterize and optimize the hydrodynamics in a UASB (Wei et al., 2019). However, the gas phase in this model is considered as a continuum, similar to the liquid phase. Though the influence of hydrodynamic conditions on mass transfer, AGS size distribution, and biogas production are well studied (Afridi et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2012a, 2012b), little is known about the interaction between biogas bubbles and AGS.

AGS has pores, channels, and cavities, which are conducive to the transport of nutrients, metabolites, and biogas bubbles (Jiang et al., 2016). Jiang et al. (2016) proposed that the micro-bubbles of biogas inside AGS diffused toward large-size channels to form an observable bubble on AGS. At a certain time, the bubble detaches from the surface of AGS to form a crater. In addition, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that are located outside AGS govern the mass transfer of substances and products (Sheng et al., 2010). As biogas bubbles must pass through the EPS layer before detaching from AGS into the liquid phase, EPS might play a crucial role in the interaction between biogas bubbles and AGS. Hence, the interaction between gas phase and solid phase, especially the single bubble and AGS, has not been described suitably.

The impinging-jet technique (Fig. 1A) was initially used in the deposition of latex particles on glass surfaces (Dabroś and van de Ven, 1983; Dabros and Vandeven, 1987). Then it was successfully used to describe the particle and submicron colloidal particles deposition (Dijt et al., 1990; Sanders et al., 1995). Furthermore, Yang et al. (2003) measured the attachment of bubble flux onto a solid surface in an impinging-jet stagnation flow, indicating that both electrolyte concentration and hydrodynamic flow were key factors for the attachment flux. Hence, the impinging-jet technique might provide direct information on the attachment between biogas bubbles and AGS.

Even though both impinging-jet technique and CFD can describe the hydrodynamics of UASB, there is a difficulty to directly observe the interaction forces between biogas bubbles and AGS at a single-particle level. Atomic force microscope (AFM), a powerful tool for sensitive force measurements, has been widely used to quantitatively measure the interaction forces between a bubble and the surface of solids or cells (Cui et al., 2016; Ditscherlein et al., 2018; Xie et al., 2015). It has led to further understanding of many physical and biological processes, such as mining, froth flotation, and fermentation (Liu et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2017). The bubble probe AFM technique, where a gas bubble anchored on a tipless cantilever, was applied as a force probe to measure the interaction forces between a bubble and substrates (Tabor et al., 2011a, 2011b; Vakarelski et al., 2008; Xie et al., 2015). With the help of this technique, previous studies investigated the interaction of a bubble and particles under different conditions (Cui et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2015). Furthermore, Nguyen et al. (2003, 2004) indicated that the repulsive force between a bubble and a hydrophilic particle increased with increasing approach velocities of AFM tips. This bubble probe AFM technique with different approach velocities might provide a new insight into the interaction between a biogas bubble and AGS, which has important benefits on the optimization of hydrodynamics in UASB.

For the first time, the interaction between AGS and biogas bubble is investigated in this study both by impinging-jet technique and bubble probe AFM technique. The attachment between biogas bubbles (CO2 and CH4) and AGS at different Reynolds numbers was studied using impinging-jet technique. In addition, the adhesion force between a biogas bubble (CO2 and CH4) and AGS was also studied by bubble probe AFM at different approach velocities. These results may contribute to a better and new insight into the understanding of surface interaction between biogas bubbles and AGS in UASB.

Section snippets

Impinging-jet experiment

The impinging-jet experiment system is shown in Fig. 1A. Two kinds of AGS were collected from UASB treating wastewaters of beer factory (AGSb) and protein factory (AGSp), respectively. The characteristics of these two kinds of AGS are shown in Table 1. The solution in the impinging-jet apparatus was 0.9% NaCl (m/v). The AGS was washed three times with 0.9% NaCl and fixed on to the glass plate (diameter of 6.50 cm) with epoxy glue in one layer. The gas bubbles were generated using a capillary

Bubble-attachment on AGS

The attachment of bubbles and AGS is considered to occur when the bubbles attach to the AGS layer, excluding the bubbles attached to the AGS layer for a short duration (less than 1 s) and then are swept away by the flow. A typical video of bubble-attachment is shown in the Supporting Information. Based on the feature of impinging-jet technique, the bubble-attachment flux is uniform near the stagnation point. Fig. S3 shows the time-dependent change of normalized bubble-attachment density of CH4

Discussions

Bubble transport in UASB is mainly driven by hydrodynamic forces. The first step in successfully attaching the bubbles onto solids, such as AGS, was enough contact time for both bubbles and the AGS surface, so that the bubbles could deform and slide along the AGS surface to reach the maximum collision angle. Then, the liquid film between the bubble and AGS surface was thinned to a critical thickness and ruptured to form a three-phase contact. This three-phase contact was expansion and formation

Conclusions

To our best knowledge, this is the first study that applies impinging-jet technique and bubble probe AFM to explore the interaction between bubbles and anaerobic granular sludge (AGS) in UASB. The results obtained revealed that the fluxes of normalized CH4 or CO2 bubble-attachment onto AGS decreased with an increase in the Reynolds number due to the change in collision angle and the enhancement of the liquid film. In addition, for the more hydrophobic surface and oxygen-containing functional

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21776163, No. 51478453), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2019JQ18), the Qilu Youth Talent Programme of Shandong University, the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Resources of Shandong Province (SDSLKY201805), the Young creative research groups for interdisciplinary science in Shandong University (2020QNQT014).

References (63)

  • J. Jiang et al.

    Crater formation on anaerobic granular sludge

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • A. Laguna et al.

    A simple and low cost technique for determining the granulometry of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor sludge

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1999)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of anaerobic granular sludge surface and their causes: an in situ research

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Six-helix bundle assembly and analysis of the central core of mumps virus fusion protein

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (2004)
  • Y. Ma et al.

    Fabrication of super-hydrophobic film from PMMA with intrinsic water contact angle below 90°

    Polymer

    (2007)
  • Y. Mei et al.

    Binding characteristics of perylene, phenanthrene and anthracene to different DOM fractions from lake water

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2009)
  • A.V. Nguyen et al.

    Hydrodynamic interaction between an air bubble and a particle: atomic force microscopy measurements

    Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.

    (2004)
  • A.V. Nguyen et al.

    A study of bubble–particle interaction using atomic force microscopy

    Miner. Eng.

    (2003)
  • D. Nguyen et al.

    A little breath of fresh air into an anaerobic system: how microaeration facilitates anaerobic digestion process

    Biotechnol. Adv.

    (2018)
  • M.R. Peña et al.

    Dispersion and treatment performance analysis of an UASB reactor under different hydraulic loading rates

    Water Res.

    (2006)
  • C.M. Phan et al.

    Investigations of bubble–particle interactions

    Int. J. Miner. Process.

    (2003)
  • M. Ras et al.

    Protein extraction from activated sludge: an analytical approach

    Water Res.

    (2008)
  • C. Rico et al.

    Evaluation of different types of anaerobic seed sludge for the high rate anaerobic digestion of pig slurry in UASB reactors

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2017)
  • R. Sanders et al.

    Deposition of bitumen and asphaltene-stabilized emulsions in an impinging jet cell

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1995)
  • G.-P. Sheng et al.

    Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: a review

    Biotechnol. Adv.

    (2010)
  • J. Škvarla et al.

    What is the role of hydrophilic/hydrophobic surface forces and/or polar interfacial interactions in the interaction between bubbles and minerals?

    Colloid. Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp.

    (1993)
  • R. Späth et al.

    Sorption properties of biofilms

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1998)
  • F.A. Tassew et al.

    Settling velocity and size distribution measurement of anaerobic granular sludge using microscopic image analysis

    J. Microbiol. Methods

    (2019)
  • X. Wang et al.

    CFD simulation of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor for biohydrogen production

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2009)
  • P. Wei et al.

    Characterising the two-phase flow and mixing performance in a gas-mixed anaerobic digester: importance for scaled-up applications

    Water Res.

    (2019)
  • C.-Y. Wu et al.

    Understanding the granulation process of activated sludge in a biological phosphorus removal sequencing batch reactor

    Chemosphere

    (2012)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Deciphering the formation of sludge blanket structure in anaerobic granular systems from the perspective of bubble-entrapment assumption

      2022, Chemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because the negative-charged AnGS has difficulty in capturing the free bubbles, due to the electrostatic repulsion [23]. Besides, the bubbles-AnGS adhesion force decreased with increasing turbulence [24]. The above two reasons suggests that gas-entrapment rather than bubble-attachment is the main contributor of the bubble.

    • On-site domestic wastewater treatment system using shredded waste plastic bottles as biofilter media: Pilot-scale study on effluent standards in Bhutan

      2022, Chemosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the start of the UASB operation, methane generation varied widely ranging between 43 and 230 L CH4/kg COD (or of COD removed) with an overall average of 128 L CH4/kg COD during the entire pilot operation of as shown in Fig. 4 (b). This irregular methane generation could be due to random release of biogas that was already present either in dissolved form or in the form of micro-bubbles within the active anaerobic seed sludge collected from the anaerobic pond when subjected to up-flow turbulence (Feng et al., 2020). These methane generation values are similar to those reported in the literature (Ayaz et al., 2012).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally.

    View full text