Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing different alternatives by simulation to optimize a homogeneous transesterification process to improve the produced/consumed energy

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A conceptual biodiesel production homogeneous process was developed, considering the typical reaction conditions, appropriate thermodynamic models as well as the kinetics of a representative reaction for vegetable oils, under assumption to be mass-produced and provide a continuous way the raw material for the production of the biofuel. Reasonable assumptions and the use of a rigorous simulator of processes were employed; the process was simulated for the treatment of 1000 mol/h of oil operating continuously, at 45 and 55 °C, 1.0 wt% catalyst and 6 mol methanol by mol of oil. The processes of catalyst preparation, raw material pumping, heating, isothermal reaction, separation of byproducts by density and distillation were considered, and also auxiliary services of heating and cooling during the process. The convergence of each device was achieved by properly choosing the specifications of the unit operation models. Material and energy balances were obtained at each point in the process and in a global manner. For space-time of 30 min in single and series reactors global efficiencies from ~ 80 to 85% biodiesel was calculated for all explored alternatives. The ratio of energy production of biodiesel to the energy consumed by the process, within the battery limits used in this study, was found to be more than 6 times, thus ensuring the sustainability of the process from energetic point of view. It was found that, for the highest purity and better ratio of energy produced/consumed, the global efficiency process was the lowest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balat M (2005) Usage of energy sources and environmental problems. Energy Explor Exploit 23(2):141–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Yu Y, Ji F, Dong R (2016) A comprehensive review on densified solid biofuel industry in china. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1412–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA (2013) Biomass to liquid transportation fuels (BTL) systems: process synthesis and global optimization framework. Energy Environ Sci 6(1):267–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Y, Dubé MA, McLean DD, Kates M (2003) Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: process design and technological assessment. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pruszko R (2015). Biodiesel production. In: Dahiya A (ed) Bioenergy: biomass to biofuels. Academic Press, Saint Louis

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Souza T, Silva R, Melo J, Tschoeke I, Silva J, Pacheco J, Silva J (2019) Kinetic modeling of cottonseed oil transesterification with etanol. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 128:707–722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuchardt U, Sercheli R, Vargas RM (1998) Transesterification of vegetable oils: a review. J Braz Chem Soc 9(1):199–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Semwal S, Arora AK, Badoni RP, Tuli DK (2011) Biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalysts. Bioresour Technol 102(3):2151–2161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbaszaadeh A, Ghobadian B, Omidkhah MR, Najafi G (2012) Current biodiesel production technologies: a comparative review. Energy Convers Manage 63:138–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adewale P, Dumont M, Ngadi M (2015) Recent trends of biodiesel production from animal fat wastes and associated production techniques. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:574–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Trejo F, Hernández F, Chavarria J, Sotelo R (2018) Kinetics of transesterification processes for biodiesel production. In: Biernatt K (ed) Biofuels-State of development. Intech, Reijeka, pp 149–179

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ude C, Onukwuli D (2019) Kinetic modeling of transesterification of gmelina seed oil catalyzed by alkaline activated clay (NaOH/clay) catalyst. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 127:1039–1058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinto AC, Guarieiro LL, Rezende MJ, Ribeiro NM, Torres EA, Lopes WA, Pereira PA, Andrade JB (2005) Biodiesel: an overview. J Braz Chem Soc 16(6b):1313–1330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Papong S, Chom-In T, Noksa-nga S, Malakul P (2010) Life cycle energy efficiency and potentials of biodiesel production from palm oil in Thailand. Energy Policy 38(1):226–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aspen Tech (2012) Aspen physical property system. https://www.diquima.upm.es/documentos/AspenPhysPropModelsV732-Ref.pdf

  16. Aspen Tech (2016) Aspen plus for chemicals and polymers. https://www.aspentech.com/products/engineering/aspen-plus

  17. Pérez R, Elizalde I, Monterrubio C, Mederos F, Vázquez M (2019) Mathematical modeling of a slurry reactor to obtain methyl oleate from triolein [In Spanish]. In press, Ciencia ergo sum

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dossin TF, Reyniers M, Berger RJ, Marin GB (2006) Simulation of heterogeneously MgO-catalyzed transesterification for fine-chemical and biodiesel industrial production. Appl Catal B 67(1):136–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Issariyakul T, Dalai AK (2012) Comparative Kinetics of Transesterification for biodiesel production from palm oil and mustard oil. Can J Chem Eng 90:342–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fogler S (2005) Elements of chemical reaction engineering. Prentice Hall Int, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM International (2016) Standard specification for biodiesel fuel blend stock (B100) for middle distillate fuels. D6751-15C. ASTM International.

  22. Berger K (2003) Palm oil. Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition, 2nd edn. Academid Press, Cambridge, pp 4325–4331

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Dortmund Databank. Accessed October 2, 2019 from: https://ddbonline.ddbst.de/AntoineCalculation/AntoineCalculationCGI.exe?component=Methanol

  24. González M, Montoya J, González O, López F (2014) A heterogeneous biodiesel production kinetic model. Rev Mex Ing Química 13(1):311–322

    Google Scholar 

  25. Likozar B, Pohar A, Levec J (2016) Transesterification of oil to biodiesel in a continuous tubular reactor with static mixers: modelling reaction kinetics, mass transfer, scale-up and optimization considering fatty acid composition. Fuel Process Technol 142:326–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. West AH, Posarac D, Ellis N (2008) Assessment of four biodiesel production processes using HYSYS plant. Bioresour Technol 99(14):6587–6601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sandler SI (2015) Using Aspen Plus in thermodynamics Instruction: A step-by-step guide. Wiley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Santori G, Di Nicola G, Moglie M, Polonara F (2012) A review analyzing the industrial biodiesel production practice starting from vegetable oil refining. Appl Energy 92:109–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Elizalde I, Ramírez R, Ancheyta J (2013) Analytical solution to obtain the optimal volume of a series of continuous stirred tank reactors sustaining a first order reaction. Av Cien Ing 4(2):51–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Polo LM (2018). Simulation of a biodiesel production plant by homogeneous catalytic transesterification of palm oil triolein. MSc Thesis. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México (in Spanish)

  31. Martín M, Grossmann IE (2012) Simultaneous optimization and heat integration for biodiesel production from cooking oil and algae. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(23):7998–8014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Glišić SB, Skala DU (2010) Phase transition at subcritical and supercritical conditions of triglycerides methanolysis. J Supercrit Fluids 54(1):71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Knothe G (2014) A comprehensive evaluation of the cetane numbers of fatty acid methyl esters. Fuel 119:6–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zuleta EC, Baena L, Ríos LA, Calderón JA (2012) The oxidative stability of biodiesel and its impact on the deterioration of metallic and polymeric materials: a review. J Braz Chem Soc 23(12):2159–2175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fattah I, Masjuki H, Kalam M, Hazrat M, Masum B, Imtenan S, Ashraful A (2014) Effect of antioxidants on oxidation stability of biodiesel derived from vegetable and animal based feedstocks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 30:356–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qi DH, Geng LM, Chen H, Bian YZ, Liu J, Ren XC (2009) Combustion and performance evaluation of a diesel engine fueled with biodiesel produced from soybean crude oil. Renew Energy 34(12):2706–2713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dhar B, Kirtania K (2010) Excess methanol recovery in biodiesel production process using a distillation column: a simulation study. Chem Eng Res Bull 13(2):55–60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I. Elizalde and F.S. Mederos thank financial support from IPN-México, through Grants 20195583 and 20195674, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Mexicano para la Producción más Limpia (CMP+L-IPN), Av. Acueducto S/N, Col. La Laguna-Ticomán, 07340, Mexico City, Mexico

    Lorena M. Polo, Ignacio Elizalde & Fabián S. Mederos

  2. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada-Unidad Legaria, 11500, Mexico City, Mexico

    Fernando Trejo

  3. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Química e Industrias Extractivas, 07738, Mexico City, Mexico

    Edgar Ramírez & J. Felipe Sánchez

Authors
  1. Lorena M. Polo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ignacio Elizalde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabián S. Mederos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fernando Trejo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edgar Ramírez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Felipe Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio Elizalde.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polo, L.M., Elizalde, I., Mederos, F.S. et al. Assessing different alternatives by simulation to optimize a homogeneous transesterification process to improve the produced/consumed energy. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 129, 41–56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-019-01713-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-019-01713-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation